首页> 外文期刊>Academic Emergency Medicine >The Shortage of On-call Surgical Specialist Coverage: A National Survey of Emergency Department Directors
【24h】

The Shortage of On-call Surgical Specialist Coverage: A National Survey of Emergency Department Directors

机译:急诊外科专家覆盖率的不足:急诊科主任的全国调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Problems with on-call specialist physician coverage have been identified as a significant issue for our nation’s health care system. Despite this, little is known about the full extent of these coverage deficiencies in emergency departments (EDs), their effect on emergency care provision, or the subsequent effect on patient flow should specialist-requiring patients need to be transferred to centers of higher-level care. The objective was to report the experiences of a national sample of ED directors regarding the degree of difficulty in providing specialist coverage and the effect of on-call coverage problems on emergency patient care.Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional self-administered survey of a national sample of ED directors. How frequently ED directors reported on-call coverage problems, whether they recently lost on-call coverage, whether their current on-call coverage was reliable, and the potential effect on emergency care provision were all assessed.Results: The overall response rate was 62% (442 of 715). Seventy-four percent of respondents reported on-call coverage problems with specialist physicians. Sixty percent reported having lost 24/7 coverage for at least one specialty in the past 4 years. Twenty-six percent reported unreliability in their current on-call coverage. Twenty-three percent noted that their trauma center designation level had been affected by on-call coverage, and 22% noted an increase in patients leaving before being seen by a medically needed specialist.Conclusions: Difficulties in obtaining specialty on-call coverage are a pervasive issue for EDs at the national level. Emergency care provision appears to have been affected, and this issue is further impacted by a perceived unreliability in current on-call coverage provision as well as the attrition of coverage for individual specialties.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:1374–1382 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
机译:目标:待命专科医生的承保范围问题已被确定为对我们国家医疗体系的重要问题。尽管如此,对于急诊科(ED)的这些覆盖不足的全部程度,其对急诊服务的影响或如果需要将专科患者转移到更高级别的中心对患者流量的后续影响知之甚少关心。目的是报告全国范围内急诊科主任的样本在提供专家保险的难易程度以及应召承保问题对紧急病人护理的影响方面的经验。方法:作者进行了横断面的自我管理调查ED董事的全国样本。 ED主任报告呼叫覆盖问题的频率,最近是否丢失呼叫覆盖,当前呼叫覆盖是否可靠以及对急救服务的潜在影响都进行了评估。结果:总体响应率为62 %(715之442)。 74%的受访者报告了专科医生的通话覆盖问题。 60%的人表示在过去4年中至少有一项专业失去了24/7的覆盖率。 26%的受访者表示他们目前的通话覆盖范围不可靠。 23%的人指出其创伤中心的指定水平受到呼叫覆盖率的影响,而22%的人指出,在离开急诊室就医之前离开的患者有所增加。结论:获得专职呼叫覆盖率的困难在于在国家一级,电子病普遍存在。紧急护理的提供似乎受到了影响,并且当前的通话覆盖范围提供的可靠性不佳以及个别专科的覆盖范围减少,进一步影响了这个问题。《 2010年急诊医学》; 17:1374–1382©2010年学术急诊医学协会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号