首页> 外文期刊>Academic Emergency Medicine >Patterns of Use of Topical Skin Adhesives in the Emergency Department
【24h】

Patterns of Use of Topical Skin Adhesives in the Emergency Department

机译:急诊科使用局部皮肤粘合剂的方式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: The objective was to determine patterns of use of topical skin adhesives (TSA) for laceration repair. The authors hypothesized that TSA use would be more common in children and facial lacerations.Methods: This was a structured retrospective chart review. The setting was a suburban, university-based emergency department (ED) with an emergency medicine (EM) residency; the annual census is 85,000 visits. Charts from consecutive patients presenting with lacerations in the summer of 2008 (June 2008 through August 2008) were reviewed. Demographic, clinical, and wound characteristics were extracted from electronic medical records by trained investigators using structured data collection forms. Characteristics of lacerations repaired with TSA or other closure devices were compared with bivariate and multivariate analyses using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).Results: A total of 755 patients presented to the ED with lacerations over the study period, of whom primary closure was used in 667; nine were excluded because the method of closure was unknown. The most common methods of laceration closure were sutures (485), adhesives (88), and staples (86). Adhesives were used to close 27% of facial lacerations, compared to 4% of all other body locations (difference = 23%, 95% CI = 18% to 29%), and in 20% of pediatric versus 8% of adult lacerations (difference = 13%, 95% CI = 7% to 18%). Adjustment for other potential patient and wound characteristics showed that adhesives were more likely to be used to close facial lacerations (OR = 10.0 CI, 95% CI = 5.5 to 18.0) and lacerations in children (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1 to 3.0) and less likely to be used as laceration length increased (OR = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4 to 0.8). Adhesive use was not statistically associated with patient sex or race, laceration edges or shape, or the need for deep sutures. Forty-three percent of adhesive wounds were closed with no anesthetic, and a topical agent was used in another 48%. In contrast, a local anesthetic agent was injected in 87% of sutured wounds (p  0.001) and 73% of stapled wounds (p  0.001).Conclusions: Topical skin adhesives are used more often for children, facial lacerations, and short lacerations. Use of adhesives may improve patient comfort as need for injecting a local anesthetic is reduced.ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2010; 17:670–672 © 2010 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine
机译:目的:目的是确定使用局部皮肤粘合剂(TSA)修复撕裂伤的方式。作者假设,在儿童和面部撕裂伤中使用TSA更为常见。方法:这是结构化的回顾性图表审查。地点是郊区的大学急诊科(ED),有急诊医学(EM)驻地;年度普查是85,000次访问。回顾了2008年夏季(2008年6月至2008年8月)连续出现裂伤的患者的图表。训练有素的调查员使用结构化的数据收集表从电子病历中提取人口统计学,临床和伤口特征。使用比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)将经TSA或其他闭合装置修复的撕裂伤的特征与双变量和多变量分析进行了比较。结果:在研究期间,共有755名患者接受了ED撕裂伤的急诊治疗,其中667个使用了初级关闭;因为关闭的方法未知,所以排除了九个。撕裂伤闭合的最常见方法是缝合线(485),粘合剂(88)和订书钉(86)。胶粘剂用于闭合27%的面部撕裂伤,相比之下,其他所有身体部位的比例为4%(差异= 23%,95%CI = 18%至29%),儿科撕裂占20%而成人撕裂占8%(差异= 13%,95%CI = 7%至18%)。对其他潜在患者和伤口特征的调整表明,胶粘剂更可能用于闭合面部撕裂伤(OR = 10.0 CI,95%CI = 5.5至18.0)和儿童撕裂伤(OR = 1.8,95%CI = 1.1至1.1 3.0)并不太可能随着撕裂长度的增加而使用(OR = 0.6,95%CI = 0.4至0.8)。胶粘剂的使用与患者的性别或种族,撕裂边缘或形状或需要深层缝合的关系在统计学上均不相关。 43%的粘着伤口没有麻醉就被封闭,另外48%的患者使用了局部用药。相比之下,在87%的缝合伤口(p <0.001)和73%的缝合伤口(p <0.001)中注射了局部麻醉剂。结论:局部皮肤粘合剂更常用于儿童,面部撕裂伤和短性撕裂伤。使用粘合剂可以减少注射局部麻醉药的使用量,从而提高患者的舒适度。《急诊医学杂志》 2010; 17:670–672©2010年学术急诊医学协会

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号