首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T
【2h】

Optimization and Validation of Methods for Mapping of the Radiofrequency Transmit Field at 3T

机译:3T射频发射场测绘方法的优化与验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

MRI techniques such as quantitative imaging and parallel transmit require precise knowledge of the radio-frequency transmit field (). Three published methods were optimized for robust mapping at 3T in the human brain: three-dimensional (3D) actual flip angle imaging (AFI), 3D echo-planar imaging (EPI), and two-dimensional (2D) stimulated echo acquisition mode (STEAM). We performed a comprehensive comparison of the methods, focusing on artifacts, reproducibility, and accuracy compared to a reference 2D double angle method. For the 3D AFI method, the addition of flow-compensated gradients for diffusion damping reduced the level of physiological artifacts and improved spoiling of transverse coherences. Correction of susceptibility-induced artifacts alleviated image distortions and improved the accuracy of the 3D EPI imaging method. For the 2D STEAM method, averaging over multiple acquisitions reduced the impact of physiological noise and a new calibration method enhanced the accuracy of the maps. After optimization, all methods yielded low noise maps (below 2 percentage units), of the nominal flip angle value (p.u.) with a systematic bias less than 5 p.u. units. Full brain coverage was obtained in less than 5 min. The 3D AFI method required minimal postprocessing and showed little sensitivity to off-resonance and physiological effects. The 3D EPI method showed the highest level of reproducibility. The 2D STEAM method was the most time-efficient technique. Magn Reson Med, 2010. © 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
机译:诸如定量成像和并行传输之类的MRI技术需要对射频传输场()有精确的了解。已针对人脑在3T时进行鲁棒性映射优化了三种已发布的方法:三维(3D)实际翻转角成像(AFI),3D回波平面成像(EPI)和二维(2D)激发回波采集模式(蒸汽)。与参考二维双角度方法相比,我们对这些方法进行了全面的比较,重点是伪影,重现性和准确性。对于3D AFI方法,为弥散阻尼添加流量补偿梯度可减少生理伪影的水平,并改善横向相干性。磁化伪影的校正可以减轻图像失真,并提高3D EPI成像方法的准确性。对于2D STEAM方法,对多次采集进行平均可以减少生理噪声的影响,而新的校准方法则可以提高地图的准确性。经过优化后,所有方法均产生了标称翻转角值(p.u.)的低噪声图(低于2个百分点),系统偏差小于5p.u。单位。不到5分钟即可获得全脑覆盖。 3D AFI方法需要最少的后处理,并且对共振和生理效应几乎不敏感。 3D EPI方法显示出最高的可重复性。 2D STEAM方法是最省时的技术。 Magn Reson Med,2010年。©2010 Wiley-Liss,Inc.。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号