首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields
【2h】

Impact of derived global weather data on simulated crop yields

机译:导出的全球天气数据对模拟作物产量的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Crop simulation models can be used to estimate impact of current and future climates on crop yields and food security, but require long-term historical daily weather data to obtain robust simulations. In many regions where crops are grown, daily weather data are not available. Alternatively, gridded weather databases (GWD) with complete terrestrial coverage are available, typically derived from: (i) global circulation computer models; (ii) interpolated weather station data; or (iii) remotely sensed surface data from satellites. The present study's objective is to evaluate capacity of GWDs to simulate crop yield potential (Yp) or water-limited yield potential (Yw), which can serve as benchmarks to assess impact of climate change scenarios on crop productivity and land use change. Three GWDs (CRU, NCEP/DOE, and NASA POWER data) were evaluated for their ability to simulate Yp and Yw of rice in China, USA maize, and wheat in Germany. Simulations of Yp and Yw based on recorded daily data from well-maintained weather stations were taken as the control weather data (CWD). Agreement between simulations of Yp or Yw based on CWD and those based on GWD was poor with the latter having strong bias and large root mean square errors (RMSEs) that were 26–72% of absolute mean yield across locations and years. In contrast, simulated Yp or Yw using observed daily weather data from stations in the NOAA database combined with solar radiation from the NASA-POWER database were in much better agreement with Yp and Yw simulated with CWD (i.e. little bias and an RMSE of 12–19% of the absolute mean). We conclude that results from studies that rely on GWD to simulate agricultural productivity in current and future climates are highly uncertain. An alternative approach would impose a climate scenario on location-specific observed daily weather databases combined with an appropriate upscaling method.
机译:作物模拟模型可用于估计当前和未来气候对作物产量和粮食安全的影响,但需要长期的历史每日天气数据才能获得可靠的模拟。在许多种植农作物的地区,没有每日天气数据。可替代地,通常可以从具有以下特征的网格气象数据库(GWD)中获得:(i)全球环流计算机模型; (ii)内插的气象站数据; (iii)来自卫星的遥感地面数据。本研究的目的是评估GWDs模拟作物单产潜力(Yp)或限水单产潜力(Yw)的能力,这些能力可以用作评估气候变化情景对作物生产力和土地利用变化的影响的基准。评估了三个GWD(CRU,NCEP / DOE和NASA POWER数据)在中国,美国的玉米和德国的小麦中模拟Yp和Yw的能力。基于记录良好的气象站每天的数据对Yp和Yw进行的模拟作为控制天气数据(CWD)。基于CWD的Yp或Yw模拟与基于GWD的模拟之间的一致性差,后者具有很强的偏差和较大的均方根误差(RMSE),在各个地区和不同年份的绝对平均产量为26-72%。相比之下,使用NOAA数据库中观测站的每日每日天气数据与NASA-POWER数据库中的太阳辐射相结合的模拟Yp或Yw与使用CWD模拟的Yp和Yw更好地吻合(即偏差很小,RMSE为12 –绝对均值的19%)。我们得出结论,依靠GWD模拟当前和未来气候下的农业生产力的研究结果高度不确定。另一种方法是将气候情景强加给特定地点的每日观测天气数据库,并结合适当的放大方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号