首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >A taxonomy of quality assessment methods for volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information
【2h】

A taxonomy of quality assessment methods for volunteered and crowdsourced geographic information

机译:自愿和众包地理信息的质量评估方法分类

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The growing use of crowdsourced geographic information (CGI) has prompted the employment of several methods for assessing information quality, which are aimed at addressing concerns on the lack of quality of the information provided by non‐experts. In this work, we propose a taxonomy of methods for assessing the quality of CGI when no reference data are available, which is likely to be the most common situation in practice. Our taxonomy includes 11 quality assessment methods that were identified by means of a systematic literature review. These methods are described in detail, including their main characteristics and limitations. This taxonomy not only provides a systematic and comprehensive account of the existing set of methods for CGI quality assessment, but also enables researchers working on the quality of CGI in various sources (e.g., social media, crowd sensing, collaborative mapping) to learn from each other, thus opening up avenues for future work that combines and extends existing methods into new application areas and domains.
机译:众包地理信息(CGI)的使用日益广泛,促使人们采用了几种评估信息质量的方法,旨在解决对非专家提供的信息质量缺乏的担忧。在这项工作中,我们提出了在没有参考数据时评估CGI质量的方法的分类法,这很可能是实践中最常见的情况。我们的分类法包括11种质量评估方法,这些方法是通过系统的文献综述来确定的。详细介绍了这些方法,包括其主要特征和局限性。该分类法不仅为现有的CGI质量评估方法提供了系统,全面的说明,而且使研究人员能够以各种方式(例如,社交媒体,人群感知,协作映射)研究CGI的质量,并从每种方法中学习其他方面,从而为将来的工作开辟了途径,将现有方法结合并扩展到新的应用领域和领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号