首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Wiley-Blackwell Online Open >How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate EM for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?
【2h】

How Accurately Can We Measure the Reconnection Rate EM for the MMS Diffusion Region Event of 11 July 2017?

机译:我们如何准确地测量重新连接速率EM代表2017年7月11日的MMS扩散地区活动?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We investigate the accuracy with which the reconnection electric field E M can be determined from in situ plasma data. We study the magnetotail electron diffusion region observed by National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Magnetospheric Multiscale (MMS) on 11 July 2017 at 22:34 UT and focus on the very large errors in E M that result from errors in an L M N boundary normal coordinate system. We determine several L M N coordinates for this MMS event using several different methods. We use these M axes to estimate E M. We find some consensus that the reconnection rate was roughly E M = 3.2 ± 0.6 mV/m, which corresponds to a normalized reconnection rate of 0.18 ± 0.035. Minimum variance analysis of the electron velocity (MVA‐v style="italic-in-any-context">e), MVA of style="italic-in-any-context">E, minimization of Faraday residue, and an adjusted version of the maximum directional derivative of the magnetic field (MDD‐ style="italic-in-any-context">B) technique all produce reasonably similar coordinate axes. We use virtual MMS data from a particle‐in‐cell simulation of this event to estimate the errors in the coordinate axes and reconnection rate associated with MVA‐ style="italic-in-any-context">v style="italic-in-any-context">e and MDD‐ style="italic-in-any-context">B. The style="italic-in-any-context">L and style="italic-in-any-context">M directions are most reliably determined by MVA‐ style="italic-in-any-context">v style="italic-in-any-context">e when the spacecraft observes a clear electron jet reversal. When the magnetic field data have errors as small as 0.5% of the background field strength, the style="italic-in-any-context">M direction obtained by MDD‐ style="italic-in-any-context">B technique may be off by as much as 35°. The normal direction is most accurately obtained by MDD‐ style="italic-in-any-context">B. Overall, we find that these techniques were able to identify style="italic-in-any-context">E style="italic-in-any-context">M from the virtual data within error bars ≥20%.
机译:我们研究了可以从原位等离子体数据确定重新连接电场E M的准确性。我们研究了美国国家航空航天局的磁层多尺度(MMS)于2017年7月11日UT 22:34观测到的磁尾电子扩散区域,并重点研究了由L M N边界法线坐标系中的误差导致的E M中的非常大的误差。我们使用几种不同的方法为此MMS事件确定了多个L M N坐标。我们使用这些M轴来估计E M.我们发现一些共识,即重新连接速率大致为E M = 3.2±0.6 mV / m,这对应于标准化重新连接速率0.18±0.035。电子速度(MVA-v style =“ italic-in-any-context”> e )的最小方差分析,MVA style =“ italic-in-any-context”> E < / span>,法拉第残差最小化以及磁场最大方向导数(MDD- style =“ italic-in-any-context”> B )技术的调整版本都产生了类似的结果坐标轴。我们使用此事件的粒子模拟中的虚拟MMS数据来估计与MVA相关的坐标轴和重新连接率的误差- style =“ italic-in-any-context”> v style =“ italic-in-any-context”> e 和MDD- style =“ italic-in-any-context”> B 。 MVA- 最可靠地确定 style =“ italic-in-any-context”> L 和 style =“ italic-in-any-context”> M 方向当航天器观察到清晰的电子射流反转时, style =“ italic-in-any-context”> v style =“ italic-in-any-context”> e 。当磁场数据的误差小到背景磁场强度的0.5%时,MDD得出的 style =“ italic-in-any-context”> M 方向- style =“ italic-上下文中的B 技术可能会偏离35°。法线方向是通过MDD- style =“ italic-in-any-context”> B 最准确地获得的。总的来说,我们发现这些技术能够从中识别 style =“ italic-in-any-context”> E style =“ italic-in-any-context”> M 误差条内的虚拟数据≥20%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号