首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Translational Gastroenterology and Hepatology >Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Brazil: current status and perspectives—a report from the Brazilian Laparoscopic Oncologic Gastrectomy Group (BLOGG)
【2h】

Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Brazil: current status and perspectives—a report from the Brazilian Laparoscopic Oncologic Gastrectomy Group (BLOGG)

机译:巴西胃癌微创外科手术的现状和展望-巴西腹腔镜肿瘤胃切除术小组(BLOGG)的报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer in Brazil has begun about two years after the first laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) performed by Kitano in Japan, in 1991. Although the report of first surgeries shows the year of 1993, there was no dissemination of the technique until the years 2010. At that time with the improvement of optical devices, laparoscopic instruments and with the publications coming from Asia, several Brazilian surgeons felt encouraged to go to Korea and Japan to learn the standardization of the LG. After that there was a significant increase in that type of surgery, especially after the IRCAD opened a branch in Brazil. The growing interest for the subject led some services to begin their own experience with the LG and, since the beginning, the results were similar with those found in the open surgery. Nevertheless, there were some differences with the papers published initially in Japan and Korea. In those countries, the surgeries were laparoscopic assisted, meaning that, in the majority of cases, the anastomoses were done through a mini-incision in the end of the procedure. In Brazil since the beginning it was performed completely through laparoscopic approach due to the skills acquired by Brazilian surgeons in bariatric surgeries. Another difference was the stage. While in the east the majority of cases were done in T1 patients, in Brazil, probably due to the lack of early cases, the surgeries were done also in advanced cases. The initial experience of Zilberstein et al. revealed low rates of morbidity without mortality. Comparing laparoscopic and open surgery, the group from Barretos/IRCAD showed shorter surgical time (216×255 minutes), earlier oral or enteral feeding and earlier hospital discharge, with a smaller number of harvested lymph nodes (28 in laparoscopic against 33 in open surgery). There was no significant difference regarding morbidity, mortality and reoperation rate. In the first efforts to publish a multicentric study the Brazilian Gastric Cancer Association (BGCA) collected data from three institutions analyzing 148 patients operated from 2006 to 2016. There were 98 subtotal, 48 total and 2 proximal gastrectomies. The anastomoses were totally laparoscopic in 105, laparoscopic assisted in 21, cervical in 2, and 20 open (after conversion). The reconstruction methods were: 142 Roux-en-Y, two Billroth I, and three other types. The conversion rate was 13.5% (20/148). The D2 dissection was performed in 139 patients. The mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 34.4. If we take only the D2 cases the mean number was 39.5. The morbidity rate was 22.3%. The mortality was 2.7%. The stages were: IA—59, IB—14, IIA—11, IIB—15, IIIA—9, IIIB—19, IIIC—11 and stage IV—three cases. Four patients died from the disease and 10 are alive with disease. The participating services have already begun the robotic gastrectomy with satisfactory results. The intention of this group is to begin now a prospective multicentric study to confirm the data already obtained with the retrospective studies.
机译:1991年,日本北野行首次腹腔镜胃切除术(LG)后,巴西的胃癌微创手术已经开始了大约两年。尽管第一次手术的报告显示1993年,但尚未推广该技术。直到2010年。那时,随着光学设备,腹腔镜仪器的改进以及亚洲的出版物的出现,一些巴西外科医生受到鼓励去韩国和日本学习LG的标准化。此后,这种类型的手术有了显着增加,尤其是IRCAD在巴西开设了分公司之后。对受试者的兴趣日益浓厚,导致一些服务人员开始在LG上进行自己的体验,并且自开始以来,结果与开放手术中的结果相似。尽管如此,与最初在日本和韩国发表的论文还是存在一些差异。在那些国家,手术是在腹腔镜辅助下进行的,这意味着,在大多数情况下,在手术结束时通过小切口进行吻合术。自巴西成立以来,由于巴西外科医师在减肥手术中掌握的技能,该手术完全通过腹腔镜手术进行。另一个区别是舞台。在东部,大多数病例是在T1患者中完成的,而在巴西,可能是由于缺乏早期病例,而在晚期病例中也进行了手术。 Zilberstein等人的初步经验。揭示发病率低而无死亡率。与腹腔镜手术和开放式手术相比,Barretos / IRCAD的研究组显示手术时间更短(216×255分钟),口服或肠内进食更早,出院时间更早,并且淋巴结的数量更少(腹腔镜手术中28例,开放手术中33例) )。发病率,死亡率和再次手术率没有显着差异。在首次发表多中心研究的努力中,巴西胃癌协会(BGCA)收集了来自三个机构的数据,分析了2006年至2016年的148例手术患者。有98个小计,总共48个和2个近端胃直肠切除术。完全吻合术的腹腔镜为105例,腹腔镜辅助的为21例,子宫颈镜为2例,打开后为20例(转换后)。重建方法为:142 Roux-en-Y,两个Billroth I和其他三个类型。转化率为13.5%(20/148)。在139例患者中进行了D2解剖。收集的淋巴结平均数为34.4。如果仅接受D2病例,则平均数为39.5。发病率为22.3%。死亡率为2.7%。阶段为:IA-59,IB-14,IIA-11,IIB-15,IIIA-9,IIIB-19,IIIC-11和IV期-3例。四名患者死于该疾病,而十名还活着。参与的服务已经开始了机器人胃切除术,并取得了令人满意的结果。该小组的目的是现在开始一项前瞻性多中心研究,以确认通过回顾性研究已经获得的数据。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号