首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Colorectal Cancer Screening: Low Health Literacy and Limited English Proficiency Among Asians and Whites in California
【2h】

Colorectal Cancer Screening: Low Health Literacy and Limited English Proficiency Among Asians and Whites in California

机译:结肠直肠癌筛查:加利福尼亚州亚裔和白人的健康素养低且英语水平有限

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The authors examined the relationship between low health literacy (LHL), limited English proficiency (LEP), and meeting current U.S. Preventive Service Task Force colorectal cancer (CRC) screening guidelines for Asians and Whites in California. For 1,478 Asian and 14,410 White respondents 50–75 years of age in the 2007 California Health Interview Survey, the authors examined meeting CRC screening guidelines using multivariable logistic models by LEP and LHL separately and in combination. Analyses were run with the full sample, then separately for Whites and Asians controlling for demographics and insurance. For those with LEP, patient-provider language concordance and CRC screening was examined. Overall, respondents with LEP and LHL were the least likely to meet CRC screening guidelines (36%) followed by LEP-only (45%), LHL-only (51%), and those with neither LHL nor LEP (59%), a hierarchy that remained significant in multivariable models. For Whites, LHL-only was associated with screening, whereas LEP-only and LEP and LHL were significant for Asians. Having a language concordant provider was not significantly associated with CRC screening among those with LEP. Health literacy is associated with CRC screening, but English proficiency is also critical to consider. Asians with both LEP and LHL appear particularly vulnerable to cancer screening disparities.
机译:作者研究了低健康素养(LHL),英语能力有限(LEP)与满足美国加利福尼亚州亚裔和白人预防服务工作队结肠直肠癌(CRC)筛查指南之间的关系。在2007年加利福尼亚州健康访问调查中,对50-75岁的1,478名亚洲人和14,410名白人受访者,作者使用LEP和LHL的多变量逻辑模型分别或组合研究了是否符合CRC筛查指南。对全部样本进行了分析,然后分别针对控制人口统计和保险的白人和亚裔进行了分析。对于那些患有LEP的患者,检查了患者与提供者的语言一致性和CRC筛查。总体而言,LEP和LHL的受访者最不可能符合CRC筛查指南(36%),其次是仅LEP(45%),仅LHL(51%)和既没有LHL也没有LEP(59%)的受访者,在多变量模型中仍然重要的层次结构。对于白人,仅LHL与筛查相关,而仅LEP和LEP和LHL对亚洲人具有重要意义。在LEP患者中,拥有语言协调提供者与CRC筛查没有显着相关。健康素养与CRC筛查有关,但英语水平也很重要。患有LEP和LHL的亚洲人似乎特别容易受到癌症筛查差异的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号