首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Balancing authority deference and trust across the public–private divide in health care: Tuberculosis health visitors in western Maharashtra India
【2h】

Balancing authority deference and trust across the public–private divide in health care: Tuberculosis health visitors in western Maharashtra India

机译:权衡公共私营部门在卫生保健方面的权威尊重和信任:印度马哈拉施特拉邦的结核病健康访问者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While concepts such as ‘partnership’ are central to the terminology of private–public mix (PPM), little attention has been paid to how social relations are negotiated among the diverse actors responsible for implementing these inter-sectoral arrangements. India's Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme (RNTCP) has used intermediary agents to facilitate the involvement of private providers in the expansion of Directly Observed Therapy, Short-Course (DOTS). We examine the roles of tuberculosis health visitors (TB HVs) in mediating working relationships among private providers, programme staff and patients that underpin a PPM-DOTS launched by the RNTCP in western Maharashtra. In addition to observations and informal interactions with the programme and participating health providers, researchers conducted in-depth interviews with senior programme officers and eight TB HVs. Framed by a political discourse of clinical governance, working relationships within the PPM are structured by the pluralistic context, social and professional hierarchies and paternalism of health care in India. TB HVs are at the nexus of these relationships, yet remain undervalued partly because accountability is measured through technical rather than social outcomes of the ‘partnership’. Close attention to the dynamics of power relations in working practices within the health system can improve accountability and sustainability of partnerships.
机译:尽管“伙伴关系”等概念是私人与公共混合(PPM)术语的核心,但对于负责实施这些部门间安排的不同参与者之间如何谈判社会关系却鲜有关注。印度修订后的《国家结核病控制计划》(RNTCP)已使用中介机构来促进私人医疗机构参与直接观察短期治疗(DOTS)的扩展。我们研究了结核病健康访问者(TB HV)在调解私人提供者,计划人员和患者之间的工作关系中的作用,这些关系是RNTCP在马哈拉施特拉邦西部发起的PPM-DOTS的基础。除了进行观察和与计划以及参与的医疗服务提供者进行非正式互动外,研究人员还对高级计划官员和8例TB HV进行了深入采访。 PPM内部的政治关系以临床治理的政治论述为框架,其结构由印度医疗保健的多元化背景,社会和专业等级制度以及家长式服务构成。结核病高危人群处于这些关系的中间,但仍然被低估了,部分原因是问责制是通过“伙伴关系”的技术而非社会成果来衡量的。在卫生系统内的工作实践中密切关注权力关系的动态可以改善问责制和伙伴关系的可持续性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号