首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >Workplace risk factors for anxiety and depression in male-dominated industries: a systematic review
【2h】

Workplace risk factors for anxiety and depression in male-dominated industries: a systematic review

机译:男性主导行业焦虑和抑郁的工作场所危险因素:系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background and Aims: Working conditions are an important health determinant. Employment factors can negatively affect mental health (MH), but there is little research on MH risk factors in male-dominated industries (MDI). Method: A systematic review of risk factors for anxiety and depression disorders in MDI was undertaken. MDI comprised ≥ 70% male workers and included agriculture, construction, mining, manufacturing, transport and utilities. Major electronic databases (CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Informit, PsycINFO, PubMed and Scopus) were searched. Each study was categorised according to National Health and Medical Research Council's hierarchy of evidence and study quality was assessed according to six methodological criteria. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Four categories of risk were identified: individual factors, team environment, work conditions and work–home interference. The main risk factors associated with anxiety and depression in MDI were poor health and lifestyles, unsupportive workplace relationships, job overload and job demands. Some studies indicated a higher risk of anxiety and depression for blue-collar workers. Conclusion: Substantial gaps exist in the evidence. Studies with stronger methodologies are required. Available evidence suggests that comprehensive primary, secondary and tertiary prevention approaches to address MH risk factors in MDI are necessary. There is a need for organisationally focused workplace MH policies and interventions.
机译:背景和目的:工作条件是重要的健康决定因素。就业因素可能会对心理健康(MH)产生负面影响,但是关于男性主导产业(MDI)中的MH危险因素的研究很少。方法:对MDI中焦虑和抑郁症的危险因素进行了系统评价。 MDI包括≥70%的男性工人,包括农业,建筑,采矿,制造,运输和公用事业。检索了主要的电子数据库(CINAHL,Cochrane图书馆,Informit,PsycINFO,PubMed和Scopus)。根据美国国家卫生和医学研究理事会的证据等级对每项研究进行分类,并根据六种方法学标准对研究质量进行评估。结果:19项研究符合纳入标准。确定了四类风险:个人因素,团队环境,工作条件和工作-家庭干扰。与MDI焦虑和抑郁相关的主要危险因素是健康和生活方式差,工作场所的关系缺乏支持,工作量过多和工作需求。一些研究表明,蓝领工人有更高的焦虑和抑郁风险。结论:证据中存在重大差距。需要采用更强大的方法进行研究。现有证据表明,应对MDI中MH危险因素的综合一级,二级和三级预防方法是必要的。需要针对组织的工作场所MH政策和干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号