首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma
【2h】

Pros and cons of the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for upper esophageal carcinoma

机译:无气腹腔镜经食管癌根治术对上食管癌的利弊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Controversies on how to treat upper esophageal carcinoma have existed for several decades. With the application of minimally invasive techniques, surgical treatment to upper esophageal carcinoma tends to show more advantages and attract more patients. Up to now, most hospitals adopted the combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic esophagectomy (CTLE) as the way of minimally invasive surgery for upper esophageal carcinoma. But CTLE to treat upper esophageal carcinoma has its drawbacks, such as demanding certain pulmonary function and severe postoperative regurgitation. In 2011, we developed the gasless laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy (LTE) to treat upper esophageal carcinoma, which showed some advantages. The aim of this article was to compare LTE with CTLE in treating upper thoracic or cervical esophageal carcinoma and assess the value of LTE.
机译:背景技术关于如何治疗上食道癌已有数十年的争议。随着微创技术的应用,上食道癌的外科治疗趋于显示出更多的优势并吸引更多的患者。迄今为止,大多数医院都采用胸腔镜和腹腔镜联合食管切除术(CTLE)作为上食道癌的微创手术方法。但是CTLE治疗上段食管癌有其缺点,例如要求一定的肺功能和严重的术后反流。 2011年,我们开发了无气腹腔镜经食管裂孔食管切除术(LTE)来治疗上段食管癌,这显示出一些优势。本文的目的是比较LTE与CTLE在治疗上胸或宫颈食管癌中的价值,并评估LTE的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号