首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >We need to talk! Barriers to GPs’ communication about the option of physician-assisted suicide and their ethical implications: results from a qualitative study
【2h】

We need to talk! Barriers to GPs’ communication about the option of physician-assisted suicide and their ethical implications: results from a qualitative study

机译:我们需要谈谈!全科医生就医生协助自杀的选择及其伦理影响进行交流的障碍:定性研究的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

GPs usually care for their patients for an extended period of time, therefore, requests to not only discontinue a patient’s treatment but to assist a patient in a suicide are likely to create intensely stressful situations for physicians. However, in order to ensure the best patient care possible, the competent communication about the option of physician assisted suicide (PAS) as well as the assessment of the origin and sincerity of the request are very important. This is especially true, since patients’ requests for PAS can also be an indicator for unmet needs or concerns. Twenty-three qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted to in-depth explore this multifaceted, complex topic while enabling GPs to express possible difficulties when being asked for assistance. The analysis of the gathered data shows three main themes why GPs may find it difficult to professionally communicate about PAS: concerns for their own psychological well-being, conflicting personal values or their understanding of their professional role. In the discussion part of this paper we re-assess these different themes in order to ethically discuss and analyse how potential barriers to professional communication concerning PAS could be overcome.
机译:全科医生通常会长期照顾患者,因此,不仅要求中止患者的治疗,而且要协助患者自杀的请求可能会给医生带来巨大的压力。但是,为了确保可能的最佳患者护理,有关医师辅助自杀(PAS)选项以及请求来源和诚意评估的主管沟通非常重要。尤其如此,因为患者对PAS的要求也可以作为未满足需求或关注的指标。进行了23次定性的半结构化访谈,以深入探讨这个多方面,复杂的主题,同时使全科医生可以在寻求帮助时表达可能的困难。对收集到的数据的分析显示了全科医生可能很难就PAS进行专业沟通的三个主要主题:对自身心理健康的担忧,与个人价值观相抵触或对专业角色的理解。在本文的讨论部分,我们将重新评估这些不同的主题,以便从伦理上讨论和分析如何克服有关PAS的专业交流的潜在障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号