首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC
【2h】

Glyphosate toxicity and carcinogenicity: a review of the scientific basis of the European Union assessment and its differences with IARC

机译:草甘膦的毒性和致癌性:欧洲联盟评估的科学依据及其与IARC的区别

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide worldwide. It is a broad spectrum herbicide and its agricultural uses increased considerably after the development of glyphosate-resistant genetically modified (GM) varieties. Since glyphosate was introduced in 1974, all regulatory assessments have established that glyphosate has low hazard potential to mammals, however, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded in March 2015 that it is probably carcinogenic. The IARC conclusion was not confirmed by the EU assessment or the recent joint WHO/FAO evaluation, both using additional evidence. Glyphosate is not the first topic of disagreement between IARC and regulatory evaluations, but has received greater attention. This review presents the scientific basis of the glyphosate health assessment conducted within the European Union (EU) renewal process, and explains the differences in the carcinogenicity assessment with IARC. Use of different data sets, particularly on long-term toxicity/carcinogenicity in rodents, could partially explain the divergent views; but methodological differences in the evaluation of the available evidence have been identified. The EU assessment did not identify a carcinogenicity hazard, revised the toxicological profile proposing new toxicological reference values, and conducted a risk assessment for some representatives uses. Two complementary exposure assessments, human-biomonitoring and food-residues-monitoring, suggests that actual exposure levels are below these reference values and do not represent a public concern.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00204-017-1962-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:草甘膦是全球使用最广泛的除草剂。它是一种广谱除草剂,在抗草甘膦转基因(GM)品种开发后,其农业用途大大增加。自1974年引入草甘膦以来,所有监管评估均确定草甘膦对哺乳动物的危害潜力较低,但是,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)于2015年3月得出结论,其可能具有致癌性。欧盟评估或最近的WHO / FAO联合评估均未使用任何其他证据来证实IARC的结论。草甘膦不是IARC与监管评估之间意见分歧的第一个主题,但受到了更多关注。这篇综述介绍了在欧盟(EU)更新过程中进行的草甘膦健康评估的科学依据,并解释了IARC对致癌性评估的差异。使用不同的数据集,特别是关于啮齿动物的长期毒性/致癌性的数据集,可以部分解释不同的观点;但已发现在评估现有证据的方法上存在差异。欧盟评估未发现致癌性危害,修改了毒理学资料并提出了新的毒理学参考值,并对某些代表用途进行了风险评估。人体健康监测和食品残留监测这两项补充性暴露评估表明,实际暴露水平低于这些参考值,并不代表公众关注。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s00204-017- 1962-5)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号