首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Costs and benefits of omnivore-mediated plant protection: effects of plant-feeding on Salix growth more detrimental than expected
【2h】

Costs and benefits of omnivore-mediated plant protection: effects of plant-feeding on Salix growth more detrimental than expected

机译:杂食性植物保护的成本和收益:植物饲喂对柳柳生长的影响比预期的要有害

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Predators can decrease herbivore damage to plants, and this is often assumed to be beneficial to plant growth/reproduction without actual quantification. Moreover, previous studies have been biased towards strict carnivores and neglected the role of omnivorous predators in prey-suppression. Here, we examined the costs (reduction in growth) and benefits (increase in growth) of enemy-mediated plant protection via the omnivorous (prey and plant-feeding) Orthotylus marginalis, relative to herbivory by a detrimental insect pest of Salix spp. plantations, the beetle Phratora vulgatissima. In a first experiment, we compared the cost of adult beetle versus omnivore nymph plant-feeding, and assessed the (non-) additive effects of the two types of damage. In a second experiment, we quantified the reduction in plant damage resulting from beetle-egg feeding by omnivorous nymphs and subsequent benefits to plants. We found that plant-feeding by omnivores negatively affected plant growth and this effect was similar to the cost imposed by beetle herbivory. Furthermore, simultaneous damage effects were additive and more detrimental than individual effects. While egg-predation by omnivore nymphs completely prevented beetle damage to plants, there was no difference in plant growth relative to only herbivore-damaged plants and growth was still reduced compared to control plants. Thus, despite herbivore suppression, there was no benefit to plant growth of omnivore-mediated plant protection and the negative effects of omnivore plant-feeding remained. These results are a first for an omnivorous enemy, and provide novel and timely insights on the underlying assumptions of tri-trophic associations and their use for biocontrol of insect pests.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-017-3878-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:捕食者可以减少草食动物对植物的损害,并且通常认为这无需进行定量即可对植物生长/繁殖有益。此外,以前的研究偏向于严格的食肉动物,而忽略了杂食性捕食者在抑制猎物中的作用。在这里,我们研究了通过杂食性(猎物和植物饲喂)边缘的邻位直齿兽(Orthotylus marginalis)相对于食草鼠尾柳(Salix spp)有害食草的敌人介导的植物保护的成本(增长减少)和收益(增长增加)。人工林,甲虫Phratora vulgatissima。在第一个实验中,我们比较了成年甲虫和杂食性若虫植物喂养的成本,并评估了两种损害的(非)累加效应。在第二个实验中,我们量化了因杂食若虫摄食甲虫和卵而给植物造成的伤害减少,以及随后对植物的好处。我们发现杂食动物的植物饲喂会对植物的生长产生负面影响,这种效果类似于甲虫食草所带来的成本。此外,同时的损害效应是累加的,并且比个体效应更具危害性。尽管杂食性若虫捕食卵可以完全防止甲虫对植物的损害,但与仅受食草动物损害的植物相比,植物的生长没有差异,与对照植物相比,生长仍然降低。因此,尽管抑制了草食动物,但杂食动物介导的植物保护对植物的生长无益,杂食动物饲喂植物的负面影响依然存在。这些结果是杂食性敌人的首次发现,并为三营养协会的基本假设及其对害虫的生物防治提供了新颖而及时的见解。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s00442-017) -3878-4)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号