首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A comparative analysis of in vitro toxicity of diesel exhaust particles from combustion of 1st- and 2nd-generation biodiesel fuels in relation to their physicochemical properties—the FuelHealth project
【2h】

A comparative analysis of in vitro toxicity of diesel exhaust particles from combustion of 1st- and 2nd-generation biodiesel fuels in relation to their physicochemical properties—the FuelHealth project

机译:第一代和第二代生物柴油燃料燃烧产生的柴油机废气颗粒的体外毒性及其理化性质的比较分析— FuelHealth项目

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Biodiesels represent more carbon-neutral fuels and are introduced at an increasing extent to reduce emission of greenhouse gases. However, the potential impact of different types and blend concentrations of biodiesel on the toxicity of diesel engine emissions are still relatively scarce and to some extent contradictory. The objective of the present work was to compare the toxicity of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) from combustion of two 1st-generation fuels: 7% fatty acid methyl esters (FAME; B7) and 20% FAME (B20) and a 2nd-generation 20% FAME/HVO (synthetic hydrocarbon biofuel (SHB)) fuel. Our findings indicate that particulate emissions of each type of biodiesel fuel induce cytotoxic effects in BEAS-2B and A549 cells, manifested as cell death (apoptosis or necrosis), decreased protein concentrations, intracellular ROS production, as well as increased expression of antioxidant genes and genes coding for DNA damage-response proteins. The different biodiesel blend percentages and biodiesel feedstocks led to marked differences in chemical composition of the emitted DEP. The different DEPs also displayed statistically significant differences in cytotoxicity in A549 and BEAS-2B cells, but the magnitude of these variations was limited. Overall, it seems that increasing biodiesel blend concentrations from the current 7 to 20% FAME, or substituting 1st-generation FAME biodiesel with 2nd-generation HVO biodiesel (at least below 20% blends), affects the in vitro toxicity of the emitted DEP to some extent, but the biological significance of this may be moderate.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9561-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:生物柴油代表更多的碳中和燃料,并以越来越多的方式引入以减少温室气体的排放。但是,不同类型和混合浓度的生物柴油对柴油机排放物毒性的潜在影响仍然相对较少,并且在一定程度上是矛盾的。本工作的目的是比较两种第一代燃料:7%脂肪酸甲酯(FAME; B7)和20%FAME(B20)与第二代燃料燃烧产生的柴油机废气颗粒(DEP)的毒性。 20%FAME / HVO(合成碳氢化合物生物燃料(SHB))燃料。我们的研究结果表明,每种类型的生物柴油燃料的颗粒物排放都会对BEAS-2B和A549细胞产生细胞毒性作用,表现为细胞死亡(凋亡或坏死),蛋白质浓度降低,细胞内ROS产生以及抗氧化剂基因和抗氧化剂的表达增加。编码DNA损伤反应蛋白的基因。不同的生物柴油混合百分比和生物柴油原料导致排放的DEP的化学成分明显不同。不同的DEPs在A549和BEAS-2B细胞的细胞毒性上也显示出统计学上的显着差异,但这些变化的幅度受到限制。总体而言,似乎将生物柴油混合物的浓度从目前的FAME提高到20%或将第一代FAME生物柴油替换为第二代HVO生物柴油(至少低于20%混合物)会影响排放的DEP的体外毒性。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(doi:10.1007 / s11356-017-9561-9)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号