首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The particularity of dignity: relational engagement in care at the end of life
【2h】

The particularity of dignity: relational engagement in care at the end of life

机译:尊严的特殊性:生命后期关怀中的关系参与

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper articulates dignity as relational engagement in concrete care situations. Dignity is often understood as an abstract principle that represents inherent worth of all human beings. In actual care practices, this principle has to be substantiated in order to gain meaning and inform care activities. We describe three exemplary substantiations of the principle of dignity in care: as a state or characteristic of a situation; as a way to differentiate between socio-cultural positions; or as personal meaning. We continue our analysis by presenting cases on dignity in care related to us in focus groups with medical professionals. Our empirical ethical lens is in this paper is to analyse, not the meaning of dignity, but the way in which it emerges in practices where it is pursued, within relationships between people, technologies, places, regulations, and the values cherished by or embedded in them. We show that professional caregivers recognize in the dignity of the person they care for their own dignity; giving up on the one implies no less than giving up on the other. This ‘mirrored experience’ of dignity expresses itself in professional’s engagement with the situation. The value of this engagement, we argue, lies not primarily in realizing the particular content of the values at stake. We point to the importance of engagement itself, even if the values engaged with cannot be realized to the full, and even if competing versions of dignity are at stake simultaneously. In this way the caregivers provide us with interesting examples of moral actorship in situations of conflicting values.
机译:本文将尊严明确表述为在具体护理情况下的关系参与。尊严通常被理解为代表所有人类固有价值的抽象原则。在实际的护理实践中,必须阐明该原则,以便获得意义并告知护理活动。我们描述了护理中尊严原则的三个示例性实证:作为状态或情况的特征;作为区分社会文化立场的一种方式;或作为个人含义。我们通过与医疗专业人员在焦点小组中介绍与我们相关的护理尊严的案例来继续我们的分析。在本文中,我们的经验伦理视角是分析,而不是分析尊严的含义,而是分析它在追求实践的实践中在人,技术,场所,法规以及所珍视或嵌入的价值之间的关系中的出现方式。在他们中。我们表明,专业护理人员会尊重自己关心自己的人的尊严;放弃一个意味着至少放弃另一个。这种有尊严的“镜像经验”体现在专业人员对形势的参与中。我们认为,这种参与的价值并不主要在于实现所涉价值的特定内容。我们指出了参与本身的重要性,即使与之互动的价值观无法得到充分实现,即使相互竞争的尊严同时受到威胁也是如此。通过这种方式,看护人为我们提供了在价值观冲突的情况下道德行为的有趣例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号