首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule?
【2h】

Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule?

机译:合作后代护理中的转机:个体供应行为或主动响应规则的副产品?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AbstractFor individuals collaborating to rear offspring, effective organization of resource delivery is difficult because each carer benefits when the others provide a greater share of the total investment required. When investment is provided in discrete events, one possible solution is to adopt a turn-taking strategy whereby each individual reduces its contribution rate after investing, only increasing its rate again once another carer contributes. To test whether turn-taking occurs in a natural cooperative care system, here we use a continuous time Markov model to deduce the provisioning behavior of the chestnut-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps), a cooperatively breeding Australian bird with variable number of carers. Our analysis suggests that turn-taking occurs across a range of group sizes (2–6), with individual birds being more likely to visit following other individuals than to make repeat visits. We show using a randomization test that some of this apparent turn-taking arises as a by-product of the distribution of individual inter-visit intervals (“passive” turn-taking) but that individuals also respond actively to the investment of others over and above this effect (“active” turn-taking). We conclude that turn-taking in babblers is a consequence of both their individual provisioning behavior and deliberate response rules, with the former effect arising through a minimum interval required to forage and travel to and from the nest. Our results reinforce the importance of considering fine-scale investment dynamics when studying parental care and suggest that behavioral rules such as turn-taking may be more common than previously thought.
机译:摘要对于后代合作的个人来说,有效地组织资源交付是困难的,因为每个照顾者都会在其他照顾者提供所需总投资的更大份额时受益。当在离散事件中提供投资时,一种可行的解决方案是采用轮换策略,即每个人在投资后都会降低其出资率,只有在另一个护理者出资后才再次提高其出资率。为了测试在自然合作医疗系统中是否发生转弯,这里我们使用连续时间马尔可夫模型来推断板栗加冠ba(Pomatostomus ruficeps)的配给行为。我们的分析表明,转弯发生在不同的群体规模(2–6)之间,与其他鸟类相比,单个鸟类更可能跟随其他个体进行鸟类探访。我们使用随机检验表明,这种明显的转弯行为中,有一些是个体访问间隔(“被动”转弯)分布的副产品而产生的,但个体也会积极响应其他人的投资。超过此效果(“主动”转向)。我们得出的结论是,ba皮匠的转弯是它们各自的供应行为和刻意的响应规则的结果,前者的影响是通过觅食和往返巢穴所需的最小间隔而产生的。我们的研究结果加强了在研究父母的照料时考虑精细投资动态的重要性,并表明诸如轮换行为之类的行为规则可能比以前认为的更为普遍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号