首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Subgroup analysis of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the second-line setting from a phase 3 open-label randomized study of eribulin mesilate versus capecitabine
【2h】

Subgroup analysis of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the second-line setting from a phase 3 open-label randomized study of eribulin mesilate versus capecitabine

机译:二线治疗HER2阴性转移性乳腺癌患者的亚组分析来自甲磺酸依瑞布林与卡培他滨的3期开放标签随机研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This post hoc subgroup analysis of a large phase 3 study compared the efficacy and safety of eribulin versus capecitabine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer who received second-line treatment. In the phase 3 study, women with advanced/metastatic breast cancer and ≤ 3 prior chemotherapies were randomized 1:1 to eribulin mesilate 1.4 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8, or twice-daily oral capecitabine 1.25 g/m2 on days 1–14 (21-day cycles). This analysis included 392 patients. Median overall survival was longer in patients receiving eribulin compared with capecitabine (16.1 vs 13.5 months, respectively; HR 0.77, P = 0.026). Median progression-free survival and response rates were similar between arms. Both treatments had manageable safety profiles.
机译:这项针对大型3期研究的事后亚组分析比较了埃瑞布林和卡培他滨在接受二线治疗的人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性转移性乳腺癌患者中的疗效和安全性。在3期研究中,患有晚期/转移性乳腺癌且≤3次化疗的女性在第1天和第8天以1:1的比例随机分配到甲磺酸依瑞布林1.4 mg / m 2 或每天两次口服第1-14天(21天周期)的卡培他滨1.25 g / m 2 。该分析包括392名患者。与卡培他滨相比,接受埃布林治疗的患者的中位总生存期更长(分别为16.1个月和13.5个月; HR 0.77,P = 0.026)。两组之间的无进展生存期中位数和反应率相似。两种治疗均具有可控的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号