首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Frontal cortex electrophysiology in reward- and punishment-related feedback processing during advice-guided decision making: An interleaved EEG-DC stimulation study
【2h】

Frontal cortex electrophysiology in reward- and punishment-related feedback processing during advice-guided decision making: An interleaved EEG-DC stimulation study

机译:额叶皮层电生理在建议指导决策过程中与奖惩相关的反馈处理中:一项交错的EEG-DC刺激研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

During decision making, individuals are prone to rely on external cues such as expert advice when the outcome is not known. However, the electrophysiological correlates associated with outcome uncertainty and the use of expert advice are not completely understood. The feedback-related negativity (FRN), P3a, and P3b are event-related brain potentials (ERPs) linked to dissociable stages of feedback and attentional processing during decision making. Even though these ERPs are influenced by both reward- and punishment-related feedback, it remains unclear how extrinsic information during uncertainty modulates these brain potentials. In this study, the effects of advice cues on decision making were investigated in two separate experiments. In the first experiment, electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded in healthy volunteers during a decision-making task in which the participants received reward or punishment feedback preceded by novice, amateur, or expert advice. The results showed that the P3a component was significantly influenced by the subjective predictive value of an advice cue, whereas the FRN and P3b were unaffected by the advice cues. In the second, sham-controlled experiment, cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) was administered in conjunction with EEG in order to explore the direct contributions of the frontal cortex to these brain potentials. Results showed no significant change in either advice-following behavior or decision times. However, ctDCS did decrease FRN amplitudes as compared to sham, with no effect on the P3a or P3b. Together, these findings suggest that advice information may act primarily on attention allocation during feedback processing, whereas the electrophysiological correlates of the detection and updating of internal prediction models are not affected.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.3758/s13415-018-0566-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:在决策过程中,当结果未知时,个人倾向于依赖外部提示,例如专家建议。但是,与结果不确定性相关的电生理相关性以及专家意见的使用尚不完全清楚。反馈相关的负性(FRN),P3a和P3b是事件相关的脑电势(ERP),与决策过程中反馈和注意处理的可分离阶段相关。尽管这些ERP受到与奖惩相关的反馈的影响,但仍不确定在不确定性期间外在信息如何调节这些脑电势。在这项研究中,在两个单独的实验中研究了建议提示对决策的影响。在第一个实验中,在一项决策任务中,健康参与者中记录了脑电图(EEG),参与者在接受新手,业余或专家建议之前会得到奖励或惩罚反馈。结果表明,P3a组件受建议提示的主观预测值影响很大,而FRN和P3b不受建议提示的影响。在第二个假对照实验中,将阴极经颅直流电刺激(ctDCS)与EEG结合使用,以探索额叶皮层对这些脑电势的直接贡献。结果显示,建议遵循行为或决策时间均无显着变化。但是,ctDCS与伪造相比确实降低了FRN幅度,对P3a或P3b没有影响。总之,这些发现表明建议信息可能主要在反馈处理期间作用于注意力分配,而内部预测模型的检测和更新的电生理相关性不受影响。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.3758 / s13415-018- 0566-8)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号