首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Science as a Vocation in the Era of Big Data: the Philosophy of Science behind Big Data and humanity’s Continued Part in Science
【2h】

Science as a Vocation in the Era of Big Data: the Philosophy of Science behind Big Data and humanity’s Continued Part in Science

机译:大数据时代的科学职业:大数据背后的科学哲学和人类继续参与科学

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We now live in the era of big data, and according to its proponents, big data is poised to change science as we know it. Claims of having no theory and no ideology are made, and there is an assumption that the results of big data are trustworthy because it is considered free from human judgement, which is often considered inextricably linked with human error. These two claims lead to the idea that big data is the source of better scientific knowledge, through more objectivity, more data, and better analysis. In this paper I analyse the philosophy of science behind big data and make the claim that the death of many traditional sciences, and the human scientist, is much exaggerated. The philosophy of science of big data means that there are certain things big data does very well, and some things that it cannot do. I argue that humans will still be needed for mediating and creating theory, and for providing the legitimacy and values science needs as a normative social enterprise.
机译:我们现在生活在大数据时代,据其支持者说,大数据已准备好改变我们所知道的科学。声称没有理论和意识形态,并假设大数据的结果值得信赖,因为它被认为没有人为的判断力,而人们的判断力通常被认为与人为错误有着千丝万缕的联系。这两个主张导致了这样一个想法,即大数据是通过更多的客观性,更多的数据和更好的分析来获得更好的科学知识的来源。在本文中,我分析了大数据背后的科学哲学,并声称许多传统科学和人类科学家的死亡被夸大了。大数据的科学哲学意味着大数据在某些方面做得很好,而某些事情则做不到。我认为,仍然需要人类来进行调解和创造理论,以及提供作为规范性社会事业的科学需要的合法性和价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号