首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >Combined use of the hydraulic and hydrological methods to calculate the environmental flow: Wisloka river Poland: case study
【2h】

Combined use of the hydraulic and hydrological methods to calculate the environmental flow: Wisloka river Poland: case study

机译:结合使用水力和水文方法来计算环境流量:波兰维斯洛卡河:案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The scarcity of water can result in a direct conflict between the protection of aquatic resources and water use. For many agencies, environmental flow (EF) methods are essential in environmental impact assessments and in the protection of important fisheries resources. The objective of this paper is to compare selected hydrological and hydraulic methods and determine the scientifically acceptable and cost-effective way to environmental flow within a section of a mountain river with high naturalness, on the example of the Wisłoka. In this paper, environmental flow was calculated using conventional hydrological methods: Tennant’s, Tessman’s, flow duration curve and hydraulic methods, wetted perimeter method (WPM) and method based directly on ichthyofauna habitat requirements (spawn and migration). The novelty is the combined use of the hydraulic and hydrological methods which relates to flow hydraulics based directly on ichthyofauna habitat conditions. The hydraulic methods provide lower values of environmental flow in comparison with the hydrological methods. The key issue in the use of the hydraulic methods is the choice of criteria. The development of the required set of parameters while taking into account their seasonal nature shifts the method toward habitat modeling methods. However, the scope of habitat requirements of ecosystems must be defined, including the set of aquatic organisms and watercourse type before a hydraulic method may be widely used. Being generally low-cost and simple, the methods presented in this paper can be applied in the water management legislative process.
机译:水的短缺可能导致对水生资源的保护与用水之间的直接冲突。对于许多机构而言,环境流量(EF)方法对于环境影响评估和重要渔业资源的保护至关重要。本文的目的是比较一些水文方法和水力方法,并以Wisłoka为例,确定在自然度较高的山区河流中,环境流量在科学上可接受且具有成本效益的方式。在本文中,使用常规水文方法计算环境流量:坦南特(Tennant),特斯曼(Tessman),水流持续时间曲线和水力方法,湿周法(WPM)以及直接基于鱼腥草栖息地要求(产卵和迁移)的方法。新颖之处在于水力和水文方法的结合使用,这与直接基于鱼腥藻栖息地条件的流动水力学有关。与水文方法相比,水力方法提供的环境流量值较低。使用液压方法的关键问题是标准的选择。在考虑到参数的季节性特性之后,所需参数集的发展使该方法转向了生境建模方法。但是,在广泛采用水力方法之前,必须确定生态系统对栖息地的要求范围,包括水生生物的种类和水道类型。由于总体上成本低廉且简单,本文提出的方法可用于水管理立法过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号