首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >The agro-enabled urban revolution pesticides politics and popular culture: a case study of land use birds and insecticides in the USA
【2h】

The agro-enabled urban revolution pesticides politics and popular culture: a case study of land use birds and insecticides in the USA

机译:由农业推动的城市革命农药政治和大众文化:以美国土地利用鸟类和杀虫剂为例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Urbanization is an inevitable process in human civilization. When populations expand, socio-economic and political dynamics typically shift from agricultural predominance to one of industry and services. Accordingly, agrarian societies transform from diffuse rural communities to dense urban centers. By 2050, the world’s population is projected to reach 9.1 billion, with the urban population growing from 50 to 70%. Inevitably, this ever-expanding urban frontier encroaches along the human-ecological interface, creating a challenge for conservation and biodiversity. For the past 30 years, agricultural cropland area in the USA has remained fairly constant, despite significant population growth over the same time period. Thus, agricultural production in America has more than kept pace with rapid population growth and global export demand without increasing the farmland footprint at the expense of wildlife habitat. This is primarily due to considerable advances made in pesticide development, safety, and regulation, coupled with soil conservation and genetically modified crops. Still, the potential contribution of agriculture to ecosystem impairment remains contentious, particularly with regard to current use of pesticides. Recently, significant focus has been placed on the state of bird populations in the USA. Many species are considered imperiled, and this is often attributed in the popular media to pesticide use. However, focusing solely on the agricultural/chemical story as a significant driver of species viability and ecological risk within the broader biodiversity and conservation narrative lacks context and perspective. Moreover, the hypothesis that pesticides are indirectly affecting bird population status via reductions in food resources should be considered with caution and within the context of other likely causes. This work explores the dynamics between historical land use, human-controlled activity, and bird population trends from a holistic perspective within the USA. The aim is to provide context, developed from a relative comparison of potential contributing factors, in order to help inform discussion and foster dialogue between industry, academia, government, non-governmental organizations, and the public.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-019-05305-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:城市化是人类文明的必然进程。当人口增长时,社会经济和政治动力通常从农业主导转向工业和服务业之一。因此,农业社会从分散的农村社区转变为密集的城市中心。到2050年,世界人口预计将达到91亿,城市人口将从50%增长到70%。不可避免地,这个不断扩展的城市边界沿人与生态的交汇处蔓延,对保护和生物多样性提出了挑战。在过去的30年中,尽管同期美国人口大量增长,但美国的农业耕地面积一直保持相当稳定。因此,美国的农业生产已经远远超过了人口的快速增长和全球出口需求,而没有以牺牲野生动植物栖息地为代价增加农田的足迹。这主要归因于农药开发,安全和法规方面的巨大进步,以及土壤保护和转基因作物。但是,农业对生态系统损害的潜在贡献仍然存在争议,特别是在目前使用农药方面。最近,人们把重点放在美国鸟类的数量上。人们认为许多物种受到威胁,这在流行媒体中经常归因于农药的使用。但是,仅将农业/化学故事作为整个生物多样性和保护叙事中物种生存能力和生态风险的重要驱动因素是缺乏背景和观点的。此外,应谨慎考虑农药通过减少粮食资源间接影响禽鸟种群状况的假设,并应考虑其他可能原因。这项工作从美国的整体角度探讨了历史土地利用,人类控制活动和鸟类种群趋势之间的动态关系。目的是提供从潜在影响因素的相对比较中获得的背景信息,以帮助为行业,学术界,政府,非政府组织和公众之间的讨论提供信息并促进对话。 (10.1007 / s11356-019-05305-9)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号