首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >To the Edge of the Urban Landscape: Homelessness and the Politics of Care
【2h】

To the Edge of the Urban Landscape: Homelessness and the Politics of Care

机译:走向城市景观边缘:无家可归与关怀政治

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Homelessness is an obvious moral challenge, given the fact that it is a problem that millions of people in the developed world have to deal with on a daily basis. In the relatively scarce literature on this subject, there appear to be—roughly—three main approaches, namely, what I will refer to as the “difference approach,” the “liberal approach” and the “care approach.” In the paper I will critically review these three moral perspectives on the issue of homelessness. I will argue that the difference approach and the liberal approach in the end are unconvincing. Homelessness can hardly be interpreted in terms of an internally valued group identity nor in terms of autonomy and its preconditions. I will defend a version of the care approach instead, an approach that focuses on the concrete and particular needs of the homeless.
机译:鉴于无家可归是一个明显的道德挑战,因为这是发达国家千百万人每天都要面对的问题。在关于该主题的相对稀缺的文献中,似乎有大约三种主要方法,即我所说的“差异方法”,“自由方法”和“护理方法”。在本文中,我将批判性地回顾关于无家可归问题的这三种道德观点。我将争辩说,最终的差异方法和自由主义方法令人信服。无家可归者很难以内部重视的群体身份或自主权及其先决条件来解释。我将捍卫照料方法的一种版本,该方法侧重于无家可归者的具体和特殊需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号