首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Deriving percentage study weights in multi-parameter meta-analysismodels: with application to meta-regression network meta-analysis and one-stageindividual participant data models
【2h】

Deriving percentage study weights in multi-parameter meta-analysismodels: with application to meta-regression network meta-analysis and one-stageindividual participant data models

机译:在多参数荟萃分析中得出研究权重百分比模型:应用于元回归网络元分析和一级个人参与者数据模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many meta-analysis models contain multiple parameters, for example due to multiple outcomes, multiple treatments or multiple regression coefficients. In particular, meta-regression models may contain multiple study-level covariates, and one-stage individual participant data meta-analysis models may contain multiple patient-level covariates and interactions. Here, we propose how to derive percentage study weights for such situations, in order to reveal the (otherwise hidden) contribution of each study toward the parameter estimates of interest. We assume that studies are independent, and utilise a decomposition of Fisher’s information matrix to decompose the total variance matrix of parameter estimates into study-specific contributions, from which percentage weights are derived. This approach generalises how percentage weights are calculated in a traditional, single parameter meta-analysis model. Application is made to one- and two-stage individual participant data meta-analyses, meta-regression and network (multivariate) meta-analysis of multiple treatments. These reveal percentage study weights toward clinically important estimates, such as summary treatment effects and treatment-covariate interactions, and are especially useful when some studies are potential outliers or at high risk of bias. We alsoderive percentage study weights toward methodologically interesting measures,such as the magnitude of ecological bias (difference between within-study andacross-study associations) and the amount of inconsistency (difference betweendirect and indirect evidence in a network meta-analysis).
机译:许多荟萃分析模型包含多个参数,例如由于多个结果,多种处理或多种回归系数。特别是,元回归模型可能包含多个研究级别的协变量,而一个阶段的个体参与者数据元分析模型可能包含多个患者级别的协变量和交互作用。在这里,我们提出了如何得出这种情况下研究权重的百分比,以揭示每个研究对感兴趣的参数估计的(否则是隐藏的)贡献。我们假设研究是独立的,并利用Fisher信息矩阵的分解将参数估计的总方差矩阵分解为研究特定的贡献,然后从中得出百分比权重。这种方法概括了如何在传统的单参数荟萃分析模型中计算权重百分比。适用于一阶段和两阶段个体参与者数据的荟萃分析,多元回归和多种治疗方法的网络(多元)荟萃分析。这些结果揭示了研究权重对临床上重要的估计值的权重,例如总结治疗效果和治疗协变量之间的相互作用,当某些研究可能存在异常值或存在偏倚的高风险时,该功能特别有用。我们也得出方法学上有意义的度量的研究权重百分比,例如生态偏差的大小(内部研究与跨研究的关联)和不一致的数量(两者之间的差异网络荟萃分析中的直接和间接证据)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号