首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SAGE Choice >Routine hospital data – is it good enough for trials? An example using England’s Hospital Episode Statistics in the SHIFT trial of Family Therapy vs. Treatment as Usual in adolescents following self-harm
【2h】

Routine hospital data – is it good enough for trials? An example using England’s Hospital Episode Statistics in the SHIFT trial of Family Therapy vs. Treatment as Usual in adolescents following self-harm

机译:常规医院数据–是否足以进行试验?自我伤害后青少年在家庭治疗与惯常治疗的SHIFT试验中使用英格兰医院情节统计数据的示例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background:Use of routine data sources within clinical research is increasing and is endorsed by the National Institute for Health Research to increase trial efficiencies; however there is limited evidence for its use in clinical trials, especially in relation to self-harm. One source of routine data, Hospital Episode Statistics, is collated and distributed by NHS Digital and contains details of admissions, outpatient, and Accident and Emergency attendances provided periodically by English National Health Service hospitals. We explored the reliability and accuracy of Hospital Episode Statistics, compared to data collected directly from hospital records, to assess whether it would provide complete, accurate, and reliable means of acquiring hospital attendances for self-harm – the primary outcome for the SHIFT (Self-Harm Intervention: Family Therapy) trial evaluating Family Therapy for adolescents following self-harm.
机译:背景:临床研究中常规数据源的使用正在增加,并且得到了美国国立卫生研究院的认可,以提高试验效率。但是,在临床试验中使用它的证据有限,尤其是在自残方面。常规数据的一种来源是《医院情节统计》,由NHS Digital整理和分发,其中包含英格兰国家卫生服务医院定期提供的入院,门诊以及急诊就诊的详细信息。我们与直接从医院记录中收集的数据进行了比较,探讨了医院情节统计数据的可靠性和准确性,以评估它是否可以提供完整,准确和可靠的方式来获取医护人员的自我伤害-SHIFT的主要结果(自我-危害干预:家庭疗法)评估自我伤害后青少年家庭疗法的试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号