首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits
【2h】

Are we restoring functional fens? – The outcomes of restoration projects in fens re-analysed with plant functional traits

机译:我们要恢复功能吗? –通过植物功能性状重新分析芬斯的恢复项目成果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In peatland restoration we often lack an information whether re-established ecosystems are functionally similar to non-degraded ones. We re-analysed the long-term outcomes of restoration on vegetation and plant functional traits in 38 European fens restored by rewetting (18 sites) and topsoil removal (20 sites). We used traits related to nutrient acquisition strategies, competitiveness, seed traits, and used single- and multi-trait metrics. A separate set of vegetation records from near-natural fens with diverse plant communities was used to generate reference values to aid the comparisons. We found that both restoration methods enhanced the similarity of species composition to non-degraded systems but trait analysis revealed differences between the two approaches. Traits linked to nutrient acquisition strategies indicated that topsoil removal was more effective than rewetting. After topsoil removal competitive species in plant communities had decreased, while stress-tolerant species had increased. A substantial reduction in nutrient availability ruled out the effect of initial disturbance. An ability to survive and grow in anoxic conditions was enhanced after restoration, but the reference values were not achieved. Rewetting was more effective than topsoil removal in restricting variation in traits values permitted in re-developing vegetation. We found no indication of a shift towards reference in seed traits, which suggested that dispersal constraint and colonization deficit can be a widespread phenomena. Two functional diversity indices: functional richness and functional dispersion showed response to restoration and shifted values towards reference mires and away from the degraded systems.We concluded that targeting only one type of environmental stressor does not lead to a recovery of fens, as it provides insufficient level of stress to restore a functional ecosystem. In general, restoration efforts do not ensure the re-establishment and long-term persistence of fens. Restoration efforts result in recovery of fen ecosystems, confirmed with our functional trait analysis, although more rigid actions are needed for restoring fully functional mires, by achieving high and constant levels of anoxia and nutrient stresses.
机译:在泥炭地恢复中,我们经常缺少有关重新建立的生态系统在功能上是否与未退化的生态系统相似的信息。我们重新分析了通过重新润湿(18个地点)和去除表土(20个地点)而恢复的38个欧洲的植被和植物功能性状恢复的长期结果。我们使用了与养分获取策略,竞争力,种子性状有关的性状,并使用了单性状和多性状指标。来自具有不同植物群落的近自然的一组单独的植被记录被用于生成参考值,以帮助进行比较。我们发现两种恢复方法都增强了物种组成与未退化系统的相似性,但性状分析揭示了两种方法之间的差异。与养分获取策略相关的性状表明,去除表土比重新润湿更有效。去除表土后,植物群落中的竞争性物种减少,而耐逆性物种增加。养分利用率的大幅下降排除了最初干扰的影响。恢复后,在缺氧条件下生存和生长的能力得到增强,但未达到参考值。在限制植被重新发育所允许的特征值变化方面,重新润湿比去除表土更有效。我们没有发现在种子性状上转向参考的迹象,这表明传播限制和定居缺陷可能是普遍现象。两个功能多样性指数:功能丰富度和功能分散度显示了对恢复的响应,并且值朝参考泥潭和远离退化的系统转移。我们得出的结论是,仅针对一种类型的环境应激源不会导致fens恢复,因为它提供的不足恢复功能性生态系统的压力水平。通常,恢复工作不能确保重新建立和长期保留per。恢复功能可以使芬生态系统恢复,这一点已通过我们的功能性状分析得到了证实,尽管通过实现高水平和恒定水平的缺氧和营养胁迫来恢复功能齐全的泥潭还需要采取更严格的措施。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号