首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >A discriminatory test for the wheat B and G genomes reveals misclassified accessions of Triticum timopheevii and Triticum turgidum
【2h】

A discriminatory test for the wheat B and G genomes reveals misclassified accessions of Triticum timopheevii and Triticum turgidum

机译:小麦B和G基因组的歧视性测试揭示了Triticum timopheevii和Triticum turgidum的错误分类登录

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The tetraploid wheat species Triticum turgidum and Triticum timopheevii are morphologically similar, and misidentification of material collected from the wild is possible. We compared published sequences for the Ppd-A1, Ppd-B1 and Ppd-G1 genes from multiple accessions of T. turgidum and T. timopheevii and devised a set of four polymerase chain reactions (PCRs), two specific for Ppd-B1 and two for Ppd-G1. We used these PCRs with 51 accessions of T. timopheevii and 20 of T. turgidum. Sixty of these accessions gave PCR products consistent with their taxon identifications, but the other eleven accessions gave anomalous results: ten accessions that were classified as T. turgidum were identified as T. timopheevii by the PCRs, and one T. timopheevii accession was typed as T. turgidum. We believe that these anomalies are not due to errors in the PCR tests because the results agree with a more comprehensive analysis of genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms, which similarly suggest that these eleven accessions have been misclassified. Our results therefore show that the accepted morphological tests for discrimination between T. turgidum and T. timopheevii might not be entirely robust, but that species identification can be made cheaply and quickly by PCRs directed at the Ppd-1 gene.
机译:四倍体小麦品种Triticum turgidum和Triticum timopheevii在形态上相似,并且可能会误判从野外收集的材料。我们比较了来自T. turgidum和Timopheevii的多个种的Ppd-A1,Ppd-B1和Ppd-G1基因的公开序列,并设计了一套四个聚合酶链反应(PCR),其中两个对Ppd-B1具有特异性,另外两个对于Pdd-G1。我们将这些PCRs与51个T. timopheevii和20个T. turgidum一起使用。这些登录物中有60个获得的PCR产物与其分类群鉴定结果一致,而其他11个登录则给出了异常结果:分类为T. turgidum 的10个登录被鉴定为 T 。 PCR中的 timopheevii 和一个 T timopheevii 的登录名为 T turgidum 。我们认为这些异常不是由于PCR测试中的错误所致,因为结果与对全基因组范围的单核苷酸多态性的更全面分析相吻合,这同样表明这11个登录号已被错误分类。因此,我们的结果表明,可接受的形态学测试可区分 T turgidum T timopheevii 可能并不完全可靠,但是可以通过针对 Ppd-1 基因的PCR廉价而快速地进行物种鉴定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号