首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >How do cotton light interception and carbohydrate partitioning respond to cropping systems including monoculture, intercropping with wheat, and direct-seeding after wheat?
【2h】

How do cotton light interception and carbohydrate partitioning respond to cropping systems including monoculture, intercropping with wheat, and direct-seeding after wheat?

机译:棉花的光截留和碳水化合物分配如何响应包括单作,与小麦套种以及小麦播种后直接播种的种植系统?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Different cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) planting patterns are widely applied in the Yellow River Valley of China, and crop yield mainly depends on light interception. However, little information is available on how cotton canopy light capturing and yield distribution are affected by planting patterns. Hence, field experiments were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to study the response of cotton canopy light interception, square and boll distribution, the leaf area index (LAI) and biomass accumulation to three planting patterns: a cotton monoculture (CM, planted on 15 May) system, a cotton/wheat relay intercropping (CWI, planted on 15 May) system, in which three rows of wheat rows were intercropped with one row of cotton, and a system in which cotton was directly seeded after wheat (CWD, planted on 15 June). The following results were obtained: 1) greater light capture capacity was observed for cotton plants in the CM and CWI compared with the CWD, and the light interception of the CM was 22.4% and 51.4% greater than that of the CWI and CWD, respectively, at 30 days after sowing (DAS) in 2016; 2) more bolls occurred at the first sympodial position (SP) than at other SPs for plants in the CM; 3) based on the LAI and biomass accumulation, the cotton growth rate was the greatest in CWD, followed by CM and CWI; and 4) the CM produced significantly greater yields than did the other two treatments because it yielded more bolls and greater boll weight. Information on the characteristics of cotton growth and development in response to different planting patterns would be helpful for understanding the response of cotton yields to planting patterns and would facilitate the improvement of cotton productivity.
机译:黄河流域广泛采用不同的棉花(棉)-小麦(Triticum aestivum)种植方式,作物产量主要取决于光的截获。然而,关于种植方式如何影响棉花冠层光捕获和产量分布的信息很少。因此,在2016年和2017年进行了田间试验,以研究棉花冠层采光,方形和铃铃分布,叶面积指数(LAI)和生物量积累对三种种植方式的响应:棉花单一栽培(CM,于5月15日种植) )系统,即棉花/小麦套种(CWI,于5月15日播种)系统,其中三行小麦行与一行棉花间作,而小麦播种后直接播种棉花的系统(CWD,播种于6月15日)。得到以下结果:1)与CWD相比,CM和CWI中的棉株观察到更大的光捕获能力,CM的光截获率分别比CWI和CWD大22.4%和51.4%。 ,2016年播种后30天(DAS); 2)对于CM中的植物,在第一个交配点(SP)发生的铃虫数量比其他SP发生的数量更多; 3)基于LAI和生物量积累,CWD的棉花生长速率最大,其次为CM和CWI; 4)CM比其他两种处理产生的产量高得多,因为它产生更多的铃铃和更大的铃铃重量。有关不同种植方式下棉花生长发育特性的信息将有助于理解棉花产量对种植方式的反应,并有助于提高棉花生产率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号