首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Researchers’ participation in and motivations for engaging with research information management systems
【2h】

Researchers’ participation in and motivations for engaging with research information management systems

机译:研究人员参与研究信息管理系统的动机和动机

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Researchers’ participation in online RIMSsThis article examined how researchers participated in research information management systems (RIMSs), their motivations for participation, and their priorities for those motivations. Profile maintenance, question-answering, and endorsement activities were used to define three cumulatively increasing levels of participation: Readers, Record Managers, and Community Members. Junior researchers were more engaged in RIMSs than were senior researchers. Postdocs had significantly higher odds of endorsing other researchers for skills and being categorized as Community Members than did full and associate professors. Assistant professors were significantly more likely to be Record Managers than were members of any other seniority categories. Finally, researchers from the life sciences showed a significantly higher propensity for being Community Members than Readers and Record Managers when compared with researchers from engineering and the physical sciences, respectively.
机译:研究人员对在线RIMS的参与本文研究了研究人员如何参与研究信息管理系统(RIMS),他们的参与动机以及这些动机的优先级。配置文件维护,问题解答和认可活动用于定义三个累积增加的参与级别:读者,记录管理者和社区成员。与高级研究人员相比,初级研究人员更多地参与了RIMS。与完全教授和副教授相比,博士后对其他研究人员的技能认可和被归类为社区成员的几率要高得多。与任何其他资历类别的成员相比,助理教授更有可能成为记录经理。最后,与分别来自工程和物理科学领域的研究人员相比,来自生命科学领域的研究人员显示出成为社区成员的意愿明显高于读者和记录管理者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号