首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?
【2h】

Do NIR spectra collected from laboratory-reared mosquitoes differ from those collected from wild mosquitoes?

机译:从实验室饲养的蚊子收集的NIR光谱与从野生蚊子收集的NIR光谱是否不同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundNear infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a high throughput technique that measures absorbance of specific wavelengths of light by biological samples and uses this information to classify the age of lab-reared mosquitoes as younger or older than seven days with an average accuracy greater than 80%. For NIRS to estimate ages of wild mosquitoes, a sample of wild mosquitoes with known age in days would be required to train and test the model. Mark-release-recapture is the most reliable method to produce wild-caught mosquitoes of known age in days. However, it is logistically demanding, time inefficient, subject to low recapture rates, and raises ethical issues due to the release of mosquitoes. Using labels from Detinova dissection results in a mathematical model with poor accuracy. Alternatively, a model trained on spectra from laboratory-reared mosquitoes where age in days is known can be applied to estimate the age of wild mosquitoes, but this would be appropriate only if spectra collected from laboratory-reared and wild mosquitoes are similar.
机译:背景技术近红外光谱(NIRS)是一种高通量技术,可测量生物样品对特定波长的光的吸收度,并使用此信息将实验室饲养的蚊子的年龄分类为7天以下或7天以上,平均准确度大于80% 。为了使NIRS估计野生蚊子的年龄,将需要对已知蚊子年龄(以天为单位)的样本进行训练和测试。重新释放标记是在几天之内生产出已知年龄的野生蚊子的最可靠方法。然而,这在逻辑上要求高,时间效率低,重新捕获率低,并且由于释放蚊子而引起了道德问题。使用来自Detinova解剖的标签会导致数学模型准确性不高。或者,可以使用以已知天数为单位的实验室饲养的蚊子的光谱训练的模型来估计野生蚊子的年龄,但这仅在从实验室饲养的蚊子和野生蚊子收集的光谱相似的情况下才适用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号