首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Impact of catheter-induced iatrogenic coronary artery dissection with or without postprocedural flow impairment: A report from a Japanese multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry
【2h】

Impact of catheter-induced iatrogenic coronary artery dissection with or without postprocedural flow impairment: A report from a Japanese multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry

机译:导管引起的医源性冠状动脉夹层的有无手术后血流损害的影响:日本多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册表的报告

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite the ever-increasing complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the incidence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of catheter-induced coronary artery dissection (CICAD) is not well defined. In addition, there are little data on whether persistent coronary flow impairment after CICAD will affect clinical outcomes. We evaluated 17,225 patients from 15 participating hospitals within the Japanese PCI registry from January 2008 to March 2016. Associations between CICAD and in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Outcomes of patients with CICAD with or without postprocedural flow impairment (TIMI flow ≤ 2 or 3, respectively) were analyzed. The population was predominantly male (79.4%; mean age, 68.2 ± 11.0 years); 35.6% underwent PCI for complex lesions (eg. chronic total occlusion or a bifurcation lesion.). CICAD occurred in 185 (1.1%), and its incidence gradually decreased (p < 0.001 for trend); postprocedural flow impairment was observed in 43 (23.2%). Female sex, complex PCI, and target lesion in proximal vessel were independent predictors (odds ratio [OR], 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.53–3.10; OR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.58–3.04; and OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.06–2.28, respectively). CICAD was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital adverse events (composite of new-onset cardiogenic shock and new-onset heart failure) regardless of postprocedural flow impairment (OR, 10.9; 95% CI, 5.30–22.6 and OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.20–4.27, respectively for flow-impaired and flow-recovered CICAD). In conclusion, CICAD occurred in roughly 1% of PCI cases; female sex, complex PCI, and proximal lesion were its independent risk factors. CICAD was associated with adverse in-hospital cardiovascular events regardless of final flow status. Our data implied that the appropriate selection of PCI was necessary for women with complex lesions.
机译:尽管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的复杂性不断提高,但导管诱发的冠状动脉夹层清扫术(CICAD)的发生率,预测指标和院内预后还不清楚。此外,关于CICAD后持续性冠脉血流损害是否会影响临床结果的数据很少。我们从2008年1月至2016年3月在日本PCI注册中心的15家参与医院中评估了17225名患者。使用多因素logistic回归评估了CICAD与医院内不良心血管事件之间的关联。分析了有或没有术后血流损害(TIMI血流分别≤2或3)的CICAD患者的结局。人口主要是男性(79.4%;平均年龄:68.2±11.0岁); 35.6%的患者因复杂病变(例如,慢性完全阻塞或分叉病变)接受了PCI。 CICAD发生于185(1.1%),其发生率逐渐下降(趋势p <0.001);术后有43例(23.2%)血流受损。女性,复杂的PCI和近端血管的目标病变是独立的预测因素(几率[OR]为2.18; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.53.3.10; OR为2.19; 95%CI为1.58-3.04; OR ,1.55; 95%CI,分别为1.06-2.28)。 CICAD与院内不良事件风险增加(新发性心源性休克和新发性心力衰竭的综合症)相关,无论术后血流损害如何(OR,10.9; 95%CI,5.30-22.6和OR,2.27;或对于流量受损和流量恢复的CICAD,CI分别为95%,1.20-4.27)。总之,CICAD发生在大约1%的PCI病例中。女性,复杂的PCI和近端病变是其独立的危险因素。无论最终血流状况如何,CICAD与医院内不良心血管事件相关。我们的数据表明,对于具有复杂病变的女性,必须适当选择PCI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号