首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Wild great and blue tits do not avoid chemical cues of predators when selecting cavities for roosting
【2h】

Wild great and blue tits do not avoid chemical cues of predators when selecting cavities for roosting

机译:选择栖息地时,野生大山雀和蓝山雀无法避免捕食者的化学暗示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Small birds use cavities for roosting to decrease the thermoregulatory costs during the winter nights. The ability of birds to detect and escape from an approaching predator is impaired during roosting and thus the selection of such cavities should take into account the risk that a predator will find the cavity. Previous evidence suggested that birds in captivity are able to detect predator scent and avoid roosting in nest-boxes containing such predator chemical cues. Here, we tested whether birds also show this avoidance response under natural conditions. We performed three studies in three populations of blue and great tits. We added predator scent, a pungency scent or an odourless control to nest-boxes and compared the use of these nest-boxes for roosting. We found no differences between the scent treatments in the use of nest-boxes. Therefore, chemical cues indicating the potential presence of a predator are not enough for birds to avoid roosting in nest-boxes under natural conditions.
机译:小型鸟类使用型腔进行栖息,以降低冬季夜晚的体温调节成本。在栖息地期间,鸟类发现并从接近的食肉动物中逃脱的能力受到损害,因此,在选择这类蛀牙时应考虑到食肉动物会发现食肉的风险。以前的证据表明,圈养的鸟类能够检测到捕食者的气味,并避免在含有此类捕食者化学线索的巢箱中栖息。在这里,我们测试了鸟类在自然条件下是否也显示出这种回避反应。我们在三个蓝雀和大山雀种群中进行了三项研究。我们在巢箱中添加了捕食者的气味,刺激性气味或无味的控件,并比较了将这些巢箱用于栖息的情况。我们发现在使用巢箱的气味处理之间没有差异。因此,表明潜在存在捕食者的化学线索不足以使鸟类避免在自然条件下栖息在巢箱中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号