首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Investigating time-efficiency of forward masking paradigms for estimating basilar membrane input-output characteristics
【2h】

Investigating time-efficiency of forward masking paradigms for estimating basilar membrane input-output characteristics

机译:研究用于估计基底膜输入输出特性的前向屏蔽范例的时间效率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is well known that pure-tone audiometry does not sufficiently describe individual hearing loss (HL) and that additional measures beyond pure-tone sensitivity might improve the diagnostics of hearing deficits. Specifically, forward masking experiments to estimate basilar-membrane (BM) input-output (I/O) function have been proposed. However, such measures are very time consuming. The present study investigated possible modifications of the temporal masking curve (TMC) paradigm to improve time and measurement efficiency. In experiment 1, estimates of knee point (KP) and compression ratio (CR) of individual BM I/Os were derived without considering the corresponding individual “off-frequency” TMC. While accurate estimation of KPs was possible, it is difficult to ensure that the tested dynamic range is sufficient. Therefore, in experiment 2, a TMC-based paradigm, referred to as the “gap method”, was tested. In contrast to the standard TMC paradigm, the maker level was kept fixed and the “gap threshold” was obtained, such that the masker just masks a low-level (12 dB sensation level) signal. It is argued that this modification allows for better control of the tested stimulus level range, which appears to be the main drawback of the conventional TMC method. The results from the present study were consistent with the literature when estimating KP levels, but showed some limitations regarding the estimation of the CR values. Perspectives and limitations of both approaches are discussed.
机译:众所周知,纯音测听不能充分描述个体的听力损失(HL),并且除纯音敏感度之外的其他措施可能会改善对听力障碍的诊断。具体而言,提出了掩盖基底膜(BM)输入输出(I / O)功能的正向掩膜实验。但是,这种措施非常耗时。本研究调查了可能的修改时间掩蔽曲线(TMC)范例,以改善时间和测量效率。在实验1中,在不考虑相应的个别“非频率” TMC的情况下,得出了各个BM I / O的拐点(KP)和压缩比(CR)的估计值。尽管可以准确估计KP,但很难确保测试的动态范围足够。因此,在实验2中,测试了一种基于TMC的范例,称为“空白方法”。与标准TMC范例相反,制造商级别保持固定,并且获得了“差距阈值”,因此掩蔽器仅掩盖了低电平(12 dB的感觉级别)信号。有人认为,这种修改可以更好地控制所测试的刺激水平范围,这似乎是常规TMC方法的主要缺点。当估计KP水平时,本研究的结果与文献一致,但是在CR值的估计方面显示出一些局限性。讨论了两种方法的观点和局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号