首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Comparison of computer systems and ranking criteria for automatic melanoma detection in dermoscopic images
【2h】

Comparison of computer systems and ranking criteria for automatic melanoma detection in dermoscopic images

机译:皮肤镜图像中黑色素瘤自动检测的计算机系统和排名标准的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, and early detection is crucial for patient survival. Computer systems can assist in melanoma detection, but are not widespread in clinical practice. In 2016, an open challenge in classification of dermoscopic images of skin lesions was announced. A training set of 900 images with corresponding class labels and semi-automatic/manual segmentation masks was released for the challenge. An independent test set of 379 images, of which 75 were of melanomas, was used to rank the participants. This article demonstrates the impact of ranking criteria, segmentation method and classifier, and highlights the clinical perspective. We compare five different measures for diagnostic accuracy by analysing the resulting ranking of the computer systems in the challenge. Choice of performance measure had great impact on the ranking. Systems that were ranked among the top three for one measure, dropped to the bottom half when changing performance measure. Nevus Doctor, a computer system previously developed by the authors, was used to participate in the challenge, and investigate the impact of segmentation and classifier. The diagnostic accuracy when using an automatic versus the semi-automatic/manual segmentation is investigated. The unexpected small impact of segmentation method suggests that improvements of the automatic segmentation method w.r.t. resemblance to semi-automatic/manual segmentation will not improve diagnostic accuracy substantially. A small set of similar classification algorithms are used to investigate the impact of classifier on the diagnostic accuracy. The variability in diagnostic accuracy for different classifier algorithms was larger than the variability for segmentation methods, and suggests a focus for future investigations. From a clinical perspective, the misclassification of a melanoma as benign has far greater cost than the misclassification of a benign lesion. For computer systems to have clinical impact, their performance should be ranked by a high-sensitivity measure.
机译:黑色素瘤是最致命的皮肤癌形式,早期发现对于患者生存至关重要。计算机系统可以协助黑色素瘤的检测,但在临床实践中并不广泛。 2016年,在皮肤病变的皮肤镜图像分类方面出现了公开挑战。针对该挑战发布了具有相应类别标签和半自动/手动分割蒙版的900张图像训练集。使用379张图像(其中75张是黑色素瘤)的独立测试集对参与者进行排名。本文展示了排名标准,细分方法和分类器的影响,并突出了临床前景。通过分析挑战中计算机系统的最终排名,我们比较了五种不同的诊断准确性度量。绩效指标的选择对排名有很大影响。一项衡量指标名列前三名的系统,而更改性能衡量指标则降至下半部分。以前由作者开发的计算机系统Nevus Doctor被用来参与挑战,并研究分段和分类器的影响。研究使用自动与半自动/手动分割时的诊断准确性。分割方法带来的意想不到的小影响表明自动分割方法w.r.t.与半自动/手动细分类似,将不会显着提高诊断准确性。一小组类似的分类算法用于研究分类器对诊断准确性的影响。不同分类器算法的诊断准确性差异要大于细分方法的差异,这是未来研究的重点。从临床角度来看,将黑色素瘤错误分类为良性病变要比错误分类良性病变的成本高得多。为了使计算机系统具有临床影响,应通过高灵敏度的方法对它们的性能进行排名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号