首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Direct and indirect effects of different types of microplastics on freshwater prey (Corbicula fluminea) and their predator (Acipenser transmontanus)
【2h】

Direct and indirect effects of different types of microplastics on freshwater prey (Corbicula fluminea) and their predator (Acipenser transmontanus)

机译:不同类型的微塑料对淡水猎物(Corbicula fluminea)及其捕食者(Acipenser transmontanus)的直接和间接影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We examined whether environmentally relevant concentrations of different types of microplastics, with or without PCBs, directly affect freshwater prey and indirectly affect their predators. Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea) were exposed to environmentally relevant concentrations of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene, polyvinylchloride (PVC) or polystyrene with and without polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) for 28 days. Their predators, white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus), were exposed to clams from each treatment for 28 days. In both species, we examined bioaccumulation of PCBs and effects (i.e., immunohistochemistry, histology, behavior, condition, mortality) across several levels of biological organization. PCBs were not detected in prey or predator, and thus differences in bioaccumulation of PCBs among polymers and biomagnification in predators could not be measured. One of the main objectives of this study was to test the hypothesis that bioaccumulation of PCBs would differ among polymer types. Because we could not answer this question experimentally, a bioaccumulation model was run and predicted that concentrations of PCBs in clams exposed to polyethylene and polystyrene would be greater than PET and PVC. Observed effects, although subtle, seemed to be due to microplastics rather than PCBs alone. For example, histopathology showed tubular dilation in clams exposed to microplastics with PCBs, with only mild effects in clams exposed to PCBs alone.
机译:我们检查了与环境相关的不同类型的微量塑料的浓度,无论有无多氯联苯,都直接影响淡水捕食,并间接影响其捕食者。将亚洲蛤(Corbicula fluminea)暴露于环境相关浓度的聚对苯二甲酸乙二酯(PET),聚乙烯,聚氯乙烯(PVC)或有或没有多氯联苯(PCB)的聚苯乙烯中28天。他们的捕食者白st(Acipenser transmontanus)在每种处理中都接触了蛤28 28天。在这两个物种中,我们都在多个生物组织水平上检查了PCBs的生物蓄积及其影响(即免疫组织化学,组织学,行为,状况,死亡率)。在猎物或捕食者中未检测到多氯联苯,因此无法测量聚合物之间多氯联苯的生物累积和捕食者中生物放大倍数的差异。这项研究的主要目的之一是检验以下假设,即多聚体类型的生物积聚多氯联苯会有所不同。由于我们无法通过实验回答这个问题,因此运行了一个生物富集模型,并预测暴露于聚乙烯和聚苯乙烯的蛤c中的PCB浓度将高于PET和PVC。观察到的效果虽然微妙,但似乎是由于微塑料而不是仅由多氯联苯造成的。例如,组织病理学表明,在暴露于含有PCB的微塑料的蛤中,肾小管扩张,仅对暴露于PCB的蛤有轻微的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号