首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Head Motion and Inattention/Hyperactivity Share Common Genetic Influences: Implications for fMRI Studies of ADHD
【2h】

Head Motion and Inattention/Hyperactivity Share Common Genetic Influences: Implications for fMRI Studies of ADHD

机译:头部运动和注意力不集中/多动症共享共同的遗传影响:对多动症的功能磁共振成像研究的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Head motion (HM) is a well known confound in analyses of functional MRI (fMRI) data. Neuroimaging researchers therefore typically treat HM as a nuisance covariate in their analyses. Even so, it is possible that HM shares a common genetic influence with the trait of interest. Here we investigate the extent to which this relationship is due to shared genetic factors, using HM extracted from resting-state fMRI and maternal and self report measures of Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity from the Strengths and Weaknesses of ADHD Symptoms and Normal Behaviour (SWAN) scales. Our sample consisted of healthy young adult twins (N = 627 (63% females) including 95 MZ and 144 DZ twin pairs, mean age 22, who had mother-reported SWAN; N = 725 (58% females) including 101 MZ and 156 DZ pairs, mean age 25, with self reported SWAN). This design enabled us to distinguish genetic from environmental factors in the association between head movement and ADHD scales. HM was moderately correlated with maternal reports of Inattention (r = 0.17, p-value = 7.4E-5) and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity (r = 0.16, p-value = 2.9E-4), and these associations were mainly due to pleiotropic genetic factors with genetic correlations [95% CIs] of rg = 0.24 [0.02, 0.43] and rg = 0.23 [0.07, 0.39]. Correlations between self-reports and HM were not significant, due largely to increased measurement error. These results indicate that treating HM as a nuisance covariate in neuroimaging studies of ADHD will likely reduce power to detect between-group effects, as the implicit assumption of independence between HM and Inattention or Hyperactivity-Impulsivity is not warranted. The implications of this finding are problematic for fMRI studies of ADHD, as failing to apply HM correction is known to increase the likelihood of false positives. We discuss two ways to circumvent this problem: censoring the motion contaminated frames of the RS-fMRI scan or explicitly modeling the relationship between HM and Inattention or Hyperactivity-Impulsivity.
机译:头部运动(HM)是功能性MRI(fMRI)数据分析中的众所周知的混淆。因此,神经影像学研究人员通常在分析中将HM视为令人讨厌的协变量。即使这样,HM仍可能具有感兴趣的性状共同的遗传影响。在这里,我们使用静息状态功能磁共振成像提取的HM,以及多动症症状和正常行为(SWAN)的长处和短处,对母体和自我报告的注意力不集中和多动-冲动进行测量,调查这种关系是由于共有的遗传因素造成的秤。我们的样本包括健康的年轻成年双胞胎(N = 627(63%女性),包括95 MZ和144 DZ双胞胎,平均年龄22岁,母亲报告了SWAN; N = 725(女性58%),包括101 MZ和156 DZ对,平均年龄25岁,带有自我报告的SWAN)。这种设计使我们能够区分头部运动与ADHD量表之间关联的遗传因素与环境因素。 HM与孕妇注意力不集中(r = 0.17,p-value = 7.4E-5)和多动-冲动(r = 0.16,p-value = 2.9E-4)的相关性中等,这些关联主要是由于多效性具有遗传相关性[95%CIs]的rg = 0.24 [0.02,0.43]和rg = 0.23 [0.07,0.39]。自我报告与HM之间的相关性不明显,这在很大程度上是由于测量误差的增加。这些结果表明,在多动症神经影像学研究中,将HM作为令人讨厌的协变量来对待,可能会降低检测组间效应的能力,因为不保证HM与注意力不集中或过度活跃冲动之间存在独立性的隐含假设。这一发现对于ADHD的fMRI研究存在问题,因为已知无法应用HM校正会增加假阳性的可能性。我们讨论了两种方法来解决此问题:审查RS-fMRI扫描受运动污染的帧或显式建模HM与注意力不集中或多动症-冲动之间的关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号