首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Analysis and Implementation of an Electronic Laboratory Notebook in a Biomedical Research Institute
【2h】

Analysis and Implementation of an Electronic Laboratory Notebook in a Biomedical Research Institute

机译:生物医学研究院的电子实验室笔记本的分析与实现

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Electronic laboratory notebooks (ELNs) will probably replace paper laboratory notebooks (PLNs) in academic research due to their advantages in data recording, sharing and security. Despite several reports describing technical characteristics of ELNs and their advantages over PLNs, no study has directly tested ELN performance among researchers. In addition, the usage of tablet-based devices or wearable technology as ELN complements has never been explored in the field. To implement an ELN in our biomedical research institute, here we first present a technical comparison of six ELNs using 42 parameters. Based on this, we chose two ELNs, which were tested by 28 scientists for a 3-month period and by 80 students via hands-on practical exercises. Second, we provide two survey-based studies aimed to compare these two ELNs (PerkinElmer Elements and Microsoft OneNote) and to analyze the use of tablet-based devices. We finally explore the advantages of using wearable technology as ELNs tools. Among the ELNs tested, we found that OneNote presents almost all parameters evaluated (39/42) and both surveyed groups preferred OneNote as an ELN solution. In addition, 80% of the surveyed scientists reported that tablet-based devices improved the use of ELNs in different respects. We also describe the advantages of using OneNote application for Apple Watch as an ELN wearable complement. This work defines essential features of ELNs that could be used to improve ELN implementation and software development.
机译:电子实验室笔记本(ELN)由于其在数据记录,共享和安全方面的优势,可能会在学术研究中取代纸质实验室笔记本(PLN)。尽管有几篇报道描述了ELN的技术特性及其相对于PLN的优势,但尚无研究直接测试研究人员的ELN性能。此外,在该领域从未探索过将平板电脑设备或可穿戴技术用作ELN补充。为了在我们的生物医学研究所实施ELN,我们首先在此使用42个参数对六个ELN进行技术比较。基于此,我们选择了两个ELN,它们由28名科学家进行了为期3个月的测试,并由80名学生通过动手实践练习进行了测试。其次,我们提供了两项基于调查的研究,旨在比较这两种ELN(PerkinElmer Elements和Microsoft OneNote)并分析基于平板电脑的设备的使用。我们最终探讨了将可穿戴技术用作ELNs工具的优势。在所测试的ELN中,我们发现OneNote几乎提供了所有评估的参数(39/42),并且两个调查组均首选OneNote作为ELN解决方案。此外,接受调查的科学家中有80%的人报告说,基于平板电脑的设备在不同方面改善了ELN的使用。我们还描述了将OneNote应用程序用于Apple Watch作为ELN可穿戴设备的优点。这项工作定义了可用于改善ELN实施和软件开发的ELN的基本功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号