首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【2h】

Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches for Children and Adolescents with Reading Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:有阅读障碍的儿童和青少年的治疗方法的有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Children and adolescents with reading disabilities experience a significant impairment in the acquisition of reading and spelling skills. Given the emotional and academic consequences for children with persistent reading disorders, evidence-based interventions are critically needed. The present meta-analysis extracts the results of all available randomized controlled trials. The aims were to determine the effectiveness of different treatment approaches and the impact of various factors on the efficacy of interventions. The literature search for published randomized-controlled trials comprised an electronic search in the databases ERIC, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Cochrane, and an examination of bibliographical references. To check for unpublished trials, we searched the websites clinicaltrials.com and ProQuest, and contacted experts in the field. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials with a total of 49 comparisons of experimental and control groups could be included. The comparisons evaluated five reading fluency trainings, three phonemic awareness instructions, three reading comprehension trainings, 29 phonics instructions, three auditory trainings, two medical treatments, and four interventions with coloured overlays or lenses. One trial evaluated the effectiveness of sunflower therapy and another investigated the effectiveness of motor exercises. The results revealed that phonics instruction is not only the most frequently investigated treatment approach, but also the only approach whose efficacy on reading and spelling performance in children and adolescents with reading disabilities is statistically confirmed. The mean effect sizes of the remaining treatment approaches did not reach statistical significance. The present meta-analysis demonstrates that severe reading and spelling difficulties can be ameliorated with appropriate treatment. In order to be better able to provide evidence-based interventions to children and adolescent with reading disabilities, research should intensify the application of blinded randomized controlled trials.
机译:有阅读障碍的儿童和青少年在阅读和拼写技能的获得方面受到严重损害。考虑到持续阅读障碍儿童的情感和学业后果,迫切需要循证干预。本荟萃分析提取了所有可用随机对照试验的结果。目的是确定不同治疗方法的有效性以及各种因素对干预效果的影响。对已发表的随机对照试验进行文献检索的方法包括在ERIC,PsycINFO,PubMed和Cochrane数据库中进行电子检索,并对书目参考文献进行检查。为了检查未发表的试验,我们搜索了Clinicaltrials.com和ProQuest网站,并联系了该领域的专家。可以包括22个随机对照试验,总共进行49个实验组和对照组的比较。比较评估了五项阅读流利度培训,三项音素意识指导,三项阅读理解培训,29项语音指导,三项听觉培训,两种药物治疗以及四种带有彩色覆盖物或镜片的干预措施。一项试验评估了向日葵疗法的有效性,另一项研究了运动锻炼的有效性。结果表明,语音教学不仅是研究最频繁的治疗方法,而且是唯一在统计学上证实其对阅读障碍儿童和青少年的阅读和拼写成绩有效的方法。其余治疗方法的平均效应大小未达到统计学意义。本荟萃分析表明,适当的治疗可以缓解严重的阅读和拼写困难。为了更好地为有阅读障碍的儿童和青少年提供循证干预,研究应加强盲法随机对照试验的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号