首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Impacts of Edaphic Factors on Communities of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea, Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria and Nitrification in Tropical Soils
【2h】

Impacts of Edaphic Factors on Communities of Ammonia-Oxidizing Archaea, Ammonia-Oxidizing Bacteria and Nitrification in Tropical Soils

机译:深度因子对热带土壤氨氧化古细菌,氨氧化细菌及硝化作用的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nitrification is a key process in soil nitrogen (N) dynamics, but relatively little is known about it in tropical soils. In this study, we examined soils from Trinidad to determine the edaphic drivers affecting nitrification levels and community structure of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ammonia-oxidizing archaea (AOA) in non-managed soils. The soils were naturally vegetated, ranged in texture from sands to clays and spanned pH 4 to 8. The AOA were detected by qPCR in all soils (ca. 105 to 106 copies archaeal amoA g−1 soil), but AOB levels were low and bacterial amoA was infrequently detected. AOA abundance showed a significant negative correlation (p<0.001) with levels of soil organic carbon, clay and ammonium, but was not correlated to pH. Structures of AOA and AOB communities, as determined by amoA terminal restriction fragment (TRF) analysis, differed significantly between soils (p<0.001). Variation in AOA TRF profiles was best explained by ammonium-N and either Kjeldahl N or total N (p<0.001) while variation in AOB TRF profiles was best explained by phosphorus, bulk density and iron (p<0.01). In clone libraries, phylotypes of archaeal amoA (predominantly Nitrososphaera) and bacterial amoA (predominanatly Nitrosospira) differed between soils, but variation was not correlated with pH. Nitrification potential was positively correlated with clay content and pH (p<0.001), but not to AOA or AOB abundance or community structure. Collectively, the study showed that AOA and AOB communities were affected by differing sets of edaphic factors, notably that soil N characteristics were significant for AOA, but not AOB, and that pH was not a major driver for either community. Thus, the effect of pH on nitrification appeared to mainly reflect impacts on AOA or AOB activity, rather than selection for AOA or AOB phylotypes differing in nitrifying capacity.
机译:硝化作用是土壤氮素动态变化的关键过程,但在热带土壤中对其了解甚少。在这项研究中,我们检查了特立尼达的土壤,以确定影响非管理土壤中硝化水平和氨氧化细菌(AOB)和氨氧化古生菌(AOA)的硝化水平和群落结构的前驱因子。土壤是天然植被,质地从沙子到粘土,pH范围为4到8。通过qPCR在所有土壤中(约10 5 到10 6 复制了古细菌amoA g -1 土壤),但AOB含量很低,很少检测到细菌amoA。 AOA的含量与土壤有机碳,粘土和铵的含量呈显着负相关(p <0.001),但与pH无关。通过amoA末端限制性片段(TRF)分析确定的AOA和AOB群落的结构在土壤之间存在显着差异(p <0.001)。铵态氮和凯氏定氮或总氮可以很好地解释AOA TRF曲线的变化(p <0.001),而磷,堆积密度和铁(p <0.01)则可以很好地解释AOB TRF曲线的变化。在克隆文库中,土壤之间的古细菌amoA(主要是亚硝基球菌)和细菌amoA(主要是亚硝基螺菌)的系统型在土壤之间有所不同,但变异与pH无关。硝化潜力与粘土含量和pH呈正相关(p <0.001),但与AOA或AOB的丰度或群落结构无正相关。总体而言,该研究表明AOA和AOB群落受到不同的营养因素的影响,特别是土壤氮素特征对AOA而言很重要,但对AOB却不重要,并且pH值不是这两个群落的主要驱动力。因此,pH对硝化的影响似乎主要反映了对AOA或AOB活性的影响,而不是选择硝化能力不同的AOA或AOB系统型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号