首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Elaboration versus Suppression of Cued Memories: Influence of Memory Recall Instruction and Success on Parietal Lobe, Default Network, and Hippocampal Activity
【2h】

Elaboration versus Suppression of Cued Memories: Influence of Memory Recall Instruction and Success on Parietal Lobe, Default Network, and Hippocampal Activity

机译:详细说明与抑制提示的记忆:记忆回忆指令和成功对顶叶,默认网络和海马活动的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Functional imaging studies of episodic memory retrieval consistently report task-evoked and memory-related activity in the medial temporal lobe, default network and parietal lobe subregions. Associated components of memory retrieval, such as attention-shifts, search, retrieval success, and post-retrieval processing also influence regional activity, but these influences remain ill-defined. To better understand how top-down control affects the neural bases of memory retrieval, we examined how regional activity responses were modulated by task goals during recall success or failure. Specifically, activity was examined during memory suppression, recall, and elaborative recall of paired-associates. Parietal lobe was subdivided into dorsal (BA 7), posterior ventral (BA 39), and anterior ventral (BA 40) regions, which were investigated separately to examine hypothesized distinctions in sub-regional functional responses related to differential attention-to-memory and memory strength. Top-down suppression of recall abolished memory strength effects in BA 39, which showed a task-negative response, and BA 40, which showed a task-positive response. The task-negative response in default network showed greater negatively-deflected signal for forgotten pairs when task goals required recall. Hippocampal activity was task-positive and was influenced by memory strength only when task goals required recall. As in previous studies, we show a memory strength effect in parietal lobe and hippocampus, but we show that this effect is top-down controlled and sensitive to whether the subject is trying to suppress or retrieve a memory. These regions are all implicated in memory recall, but their individual activity patterns show distinct memory-strength-related responses when task goals are varied. In parietal lobe, default network, and hippocampus, top-down control can override the commonly identified effects of memory strength.
机译:情景记忆检索的功能成像研究一致报告了内侧颞叶,默认网络和顶叶子区域中的任务诱发和与记忆有关的活动。记忆检索的相关组件,例如注意力转移,搜索,检索成功和检索后处理,也会影响区域活动,但是这些影响仍然不确定。为了更好地理解自上而下的控制如何影响记忆检索的神经基础,我们研究了在召回成功或失败期间任务目标如何调节区域活动响应。具体来说,在记忆抑制,回忆和配对联想的精细回忆期间检查了活动。顶叶被分为背侧(BA 7),后腹侧(BA 39)和前腹侧(BA 40)区域,分别对其进行研究,以检验与记忆力和注意力差异有关的亚区域功能性反应的假设差异。记忆力。自上而下抑制回忆消除了BA 39(显示任务阴性响应)和BA 40(显示任务阳性响应)的记忆强度效应。当任务目标需要召回时,默认网络中的任务负响应对被遗忘的配对显示更大的负偏转信号。海马活动呈任务阳性,仅在需要回忆任务目标时才受记忆力的影响。与以前的研究一样,我们显示了顶叶和海马的记忆力增强效应,但我们表明这种效应是自顶向下控制的,并且对受试者是否试图抑制或恢复记忆很敏感。这些区域都与记忆回忆有关,但是当任务目标发生变化时,它们各自的活动模式会显示与记忆强度相关的不同响应。在顶叶,默认网络和海马中,自上而下的控制可以覆盖通常确定的记忆强度影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号