首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Do Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) Diagnose Causal Relations in the Absence of a Direct Reward?
【2h】

Do Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella) Diagnose Causal Relations in the Absence of a Direct Reward?

机译:在没有直接奖励的情况下,卷尾猴(Cebus apella)是否能诊断因果关系?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We adapted a method from developmental psychology to explore whether capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) would place objects on a “blicket detector” machine to diagnose causal relations in the absence of a direct reward. Across five experiments, monkeys could place different objects on the machine and obtain evidence about the objects’ causal properties based on whether each object “activated” the machine. In Experiments 1–3, monkeys received both audiovisual cues and a food reward whenever the machine activated. In these experiments, monkeys spontaneously placed objects on the machine and succeeded at discriminating various patterns of statistical evidence. In Experiments 4 and 5, we modified the procedure so that in the learning trials, monkeys received the audiovisual cues when the machine activated, but did not receive a food reward. In these experiments, monkeys failed to test novel objects in the absence of an immediate food reward, even when doing so could provide critical information about how to obtain a reward in future test trials in which the food reward delivery device was reattached. The present studies suggest that the gap between human and animal causal cognition may be in part a gap of motivation. Specifically, we propose that monkey causal learning is motivated by the desire to obtain a direct reward, and that unlike humans, monkeys do not engage in learning for learning’s sake.
机译:我们采用了发展心理学的方法来研究卷尾猴(Cebus apella)是否会在“直接检测器”机器上放置物体以在没有直接奖励的情况下诊断因果关系。在五个实验中,猴子可以在机器上放置不同的物体,并根据每个物体是否“激活”了机器,从而获得有关物体因果性质的证据。在实验1-3中,只要机器启动,猴子就会收到视听提示和食物奖励。在这些实验中,猴子自发地将物体放置在机器上,并成功地区分出各种形式的统计证据。在实验4和5中,我们修改了程序,以便在学习试验中,当机器启动时,猴子会收到视听提示,但不会获得食物奖励。在这些实验中,猴子在没有立即获得食物奖励的情况下未能测试新颖的物体,即使这样做可能会在重新安装食物奖励传送装置的未来测试试验中提供有关如何获得奖励的关键信息。本研究表明,人与动物因果认知之间的差距可能部分是动机上的差距。具体来说,我们建议猴子因果学习的动机是获得直接奖励的愿望,并且与人类不同,猴子不为学习而从事学习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号