首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?
【2h】

Can Individual and Social Patterns of Resource Use Buffer Animal Populations against Resource Decline?

机译:资源的个人和社会使用方式是否可以缓冲动物种群以防止资源下降?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Species in many ecosystems are facing declines of key resources. If we are to understand and predict the effects of resource loss on natural populations, we need to understand whether and how the way animals use resources changes under resource decline. We investigated how the abundance of arboreal marsupials varies in response to a critical resource, hollow-bearing trees. Principally, we asked what mechanisms mediate the relationship between resources and abundance? Do animals use a greater or smaller proportion of the remaining resource, and is there a change in cooperative resource use (den sharing), as the availability of hollow trees declines? Analyses of data from 160 sites surveyed from 1997 to 2007 showed that hollow tree availability was positively associated with abundance of the mountain brushtail possum, the agile antechinus and the greater glider. The abundance of Leadbeater’s possum was primarily influenced by forest age. Notably, the relationship between abundance and hollow tree availability was significantly less than 1∶1 for all species. This was due primarily to a significant increase by all species in the proportional use of hollow-bearing trees where the abundance of this resource was low. The resource-sharing response was weaker and inconsistent among species. Two species, the mountain brushtail possum and the agile antechinus, showed significant but contrasting relationships between the number of animals per occupied tree and hollow tree abundance. The discrepancies between the species can be explained partly by differences in several aspects of the species’ biology, including body size, types of hollows used and social behaviour as it relates to hollow use. Our results show that individual and social aspects of resource use are not always static in response to resource availability and support the need to account for dynamic resource use patterns in predictive models of animal distribution and abundance.
机译:许多生态系统中的物种正面临关键资源的减少。如果我们要了解和预测资源损失对自然种群的影响,就需要了解在资源减少的情况下动物利用资源的方式和方式是否会发生变化。我们调查了有树有袋动物的数量如何随关键资源(空心树)的变化而变化。原则上,我们问什么机制可以调节资源与资源之间的关系?动物是否会在剩余资源中使用更大或更小的比例,并且随着空心树的可用性下降,合作资源的使用是否发生变化(共享)?对1997年至2007年调查的160个站点的数据进行的分析表明,空心树的可用性与山毛brush鼠的负鼠,敏捷的前肢和更大的滑翔机的数量呈正相关。 Leadbeater负鼠的数量主要受到森林年龄的影响。值得注意的是,所有物种的丰度与空心树可用性之间的关系显着小于1∶1。这主要是由于在资源丰富度低的空心树中按比例使用所有物种的情况明显增加。物种之间的资源共享反应较弱且不一致。两种物种,山头正负鼠和敏捷前足动物,在每棵被占领的树木中的动物数量与空心树的丰度之间显示出显着但相反的关系。物种之间的差异可以部分地通过物种生物学的几个方面的差异来解释,包括身体大小,使用的空洞的类型以及与空洞使用相关的社会行为。我们的结果表明,资源利用的个人和社会方面并非总是随资源的可用性而变化,并且支持在动物分布和丰度的预测模型中考虑动态资源利用模式的需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号