首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Comparison of Handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the Western Acheulean Indicates Convergence of Form, Not Cognitive Differences
【2h】

Comparison of Handaxes from Bose Basin (China) and the Western Acheulean Indicates Convergence of Form, Not Cognitive Differences

机译:Bose盆地(中国)和西部Acheulean的手斧的比较表明形式趋同,而不是认知差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Alleged differences between Palaeolithic assemblages from eastern Asia and the west have been the focus of controversial discussion for over half a century, most famously in terms of the so-called ‘Movius Line’. Recent discussion has centered on issues of comparability between handaxes from eastern Asian and ‘Acheulean’ examples from western portions of the Old World. Here, we present a multivariate morphometric analysis in order to more fully document how Mid-Pleistocene (i.e. ∼803 Kyr) handaxes from Bose Basin, China compare to examples from the west, as well as with additional (Mode 1) cores from across the Old World. Results show that handaxes from both the western Old World and Bose are significantly different from the Mode 1 cores, suggesting a gross comparability with regard to functionally-related form. Results also demonstrate overlap between the ranges of shape variation in Acheulean handaxes and those from Bose, demonstrating that neither raw material nor cognitive factors were an absolute impediment to Bose hominins in making comparable handaxe forms to their hominin kin west of the Movius Line. However, the shapes of western handaxes are different from the Bose examples to a statistically significant degree. Moreover, the handaxe assemblages from the western Old World are all more similar to each other than any individual assemblage is to the Bose handaxes. Variation in handaxe form is also comparatively high for the Bose material, consistent with suggestions that they represent an emergent, convergent instance of handaxe technology authored by Pleistocene hominins with cognitive capacities directly comparable to those of ‘Acheulean’ hominins.
机译:长达半个多世纪以来,有争议的讨论焦点是来自东亚和西方的旧石器时代组合之间的差异,其中最著名的就是所谓的“莫维乌斯线”。最近的讨论集中在东亚地区的手斧与旧世界西部地区的“ Acheulean”手斧之间的可比性问题。在这里,我们提供了一个多变量的形态计量学分析,以便更全面地记录中国博世盆地中更新世(即803 Kyr)的手斧与西方的例子以及来自整个盆地的其他(模式1)岩心的比较。古老的世界。结果表明,来自西方旧世界和Bose的手斧与模式1核心有很大不同,这表明在功能相关形式方面具有大致可比性。结果还证明了Acheulean斧头和Bose斧头的形状变化范围之间存在重叠,这表明原材料和认知因素都不是Bose人源素在与Movius线以西的人源素亲属形成可比的斧头形式时的绝对障碍。但是,西方手轴的形状与Bose示例有所不同,具有统计学意义。此外,来自西方旧世界的手斧组件彼此之间的相似性要比对Bose手斧的任何个人组件都更为相似。对于Bose材料,其手斧形式的变化也相对较高,这表明它们代表了更新世的人猿所发明的新兴的,融合的手斧技术实例,其认知能力与“ Acheulean”人猿的认知能力直接相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号