首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata)
【2h】

How to Join a Wave: Decision-Making Processes in Shimmering Behavior of Giant Honeybees (Apis dorsata)

机译:如何加入浪潮:巨型蜜蜂(Apis dorsata)闪烁行为的决策过程

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Shimmering is a collective defence behaviour in Giant honeybees (Apis dorsata) whereby individual bees flip their abdomen upwards, producing Mexican wave-like patterns on the nest surface. Bucket bridging has been used to explain the spread of information in a chain of members including three testable concepts: first, linearity assumes that individual “agent bees” that participate in the wave will be affected preferentially from the side of wave origin. The directed-trigger hypothesis addresses the coincidence of the individual property of trigger direction with the collective property of wave direction. Second, continuity describes the transfer of information without being stopped, delayed or re-routed. The active-neighbours hypothesis assumes coincidence between the direction of the majority of shimmering-active neighbours and the trigger direction of the agents. Third, the graduality hypothesis refers to the interaction between an agent and her active neighbours, assuming a proportional relationship in the strength of abdomen flipping of the agent and her previously active neighbours. Shimmering waves provoked by dummy wasps were recorded with high-resolution video cameras. Individual bees were identified by 3D-image analysis, and their strength of abdominal flipping was assessed by pixel-based luminance changes in sequential frames. For each agent, the directedness of wave propagation was based on wave direction, trigger direction, and the direction of the majority of shimmering-active neighbours. The data supported the bucket bridging hypothesis, but only for a small proportion of agents: linearity was confirmed for 2.5%, continuity for 11.3% and graduality for 0.4% of surface bees (but in 2.6% of those agents with high wave-strength levels). The complimentary part of 90% of surface bees did not conform to bucket bridging. This fuzziness is discussed in terms of self-organisation and evolutionary adaptedness in Giant honeybee colonies to respond to rapidly changing threats such as predatory wasps scanning in front of the nest.
机译:闪烁是巨型蜜蜂(Apis dorsata)的集体防御行为,个体蜜蜂的腹部向上翻转,在巢面上产生墨西哥波状图案。桶桥接已被用来解释信息在成员链中的传播,包括三个可测试的概念:首先,线性假设参与波的个体“特工蜂”将优先受到波源的影响。定向触发假设解决了触发方向的个体属性与波方向的集体属性的重合。其次,连续性描述了信息的传输而没有被停止,延迟或重新路由。主动邻居假设假设大多数闪烁主动邻居的方向与代理的触发方向一致。第三,渐进性假说是指代理人与其活跃邻居之间的相互作用,假定代理人与其先前活跃邻居的腹部翻转强度成比例关系。假想的黄蜂引起的闪烁波用高分辨率摄像机记录。通过3D图像分析识别单个蜜蜂,并通过连续帧中基于像素的亮度变化来评估其腹部翻转的强度。对于每个代理,波传播的方向性是基于波的方向,触发方向以及大多数闪烁活跃邻居的方向。数据支持桶桥假设,但仅适用于一小部分代理商:线性蜜蜂占2.5%,连续性占11.3%,渐变蜜蜂占0.4%(但在那些具有较高波强度的代理商中占2.6%) )。 90%的表层蜜蜂的互补部分不符合铲斗架桥。在模糊性方面,我们从巨型蜜蜂殖民地的自组织和进化适应性方面进行了讨论,以应对迅速变化的威胁,例如巢前掠食性黄蜂的扫描。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号