首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Taxonomic Chauvinism Revisited: Insight from Parental Care Research
【2h】

Taxonomic Chauvinism Revisited: Insight from Parental Care Research

机译:再谈分类学沙文主义:父母关怀研究的见解

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Parental care (any non-genetic contribution by a parent that appears likely to increase the fitness of its offspring) is a widespread trait exhibited by a broad range of animal taxa. In addition to influencing the fitness of parent(s) and offspring, parental care may be inextricably involved in other evolutionary processes, such as sexual selection and the evolution of endothermy. Yet, recent work has demonstrated that bias related to taxonomy is prevalent across many biological disciplines, and research in parental care may be similarly burdened. Thus, I used parental care articles published in six leading journals of fundamental behavioral sciences (Animal Behaviour, Behavioral Ecology, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, Ethology, Hormones and Behavior, and Physiology & Behavior) from 2001–2010 (n = 712) to examine the year-to-year dynamics of two types of bias related to taxonomy across animals: (1) taxonomic bias, which exists when research output is not proportional to the frequency of organisms in nature, and (2) taxonomic citation bias, which is a proxy for the breadth of a given article—specifically, the proportion of articles cited that refer solely to the studied taxon. I demonstrate that research on birds likely represents a disproportionate amount of parental care research and, thus, exhibits taxonomic bias. Parental care research on birds and mammals also refers to a relatively narrow range of taxonomic groups when discussing its context and, thus, exhibits taxonomic citation bias. Further, the levels of taxonomic bias and taxonomic citation bias have not declined over the past decade despite cautionary messages about similar bias in related disciplines— in fact, taxonomic bias may have increased. As in Bonnet et al. (2002), my results should not be interpreted as evidence of an ‘ornithological Mafia’ conspiring to suppress other taxonomic groups. Rather, I generate several rational hypotheses to determine why bias persists and to guide future work.
机译:父母关怀(父母的任何非遗传贡献似乎都可能增加其后代的适应性)是广泛的动物分类群所表现出的广泛特征。除了影响父母和后代的健康状况以外,父母的照顾也可能与其他进化过程密不可分,例如性选择和吸热的进化。然而,最近的研究表明,与分类学有关的偏见在许多生物学学科中普遍存在,并且父母照料方面的研究可能同样受到负担。因此,我使用了2001-2010年间在六种主要行为学基础期刊(动物行为,行为生态学,行为生态学和社会生物学,伦理学,激素与行为以及生理学和行为学)上发表的父母关怀文章(n = 712)与动物分类学相关的两种类型的偏差的逐年动态:(1)分类偏差,当研究产出与自然生物的频率不成比例时存在,以及(2)分类引用偏差。特定文章宽度的代理-具体来说,所引用文章的比例仅指所研究的分类单元。我证明对鸟类的研究可能代表了数量不成比例的父母护理研究,因此显示出分类学上的偏见。在讨论鸟类和哺乳动物的父母关怀研究时,在讨论其背景时还涉及相对狭窄的生物分类群,因此表现出生物分类学上的偏见。此外,尽管有关相关学科也存在类似偏见的警告消息,但在过去十年中,分类偏见和分类引用偏见的水平并未下降-实际上,分类偏见可能有所增加。如Bonnet等人所述。 (2002),我的研究结果不应被解释为“黑人黑手党”密谋压制其他生物分类群的证据。相反,我产生了几个理性的假设,以确定偏见为何持续存在并指导未来的工作。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 PLoS Clinical Trials
  • 作者

    Zachary R. Stahlschmidt;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2008(6),8
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 e24192
  • 总页数 4
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 12:34:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号