首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Induced Cooperation to Access a Shareable Reward Increases the Hierarchical Segregation of Wild Vervet Monkeys
【2h】

Induced Cooperation to Access a Shareable Reward Increases the Hierarchical Segregation of Wild Vervet Monkeys

机译:诱导合作以获取共享奖励增加了野生黑长尾猴的等级隔离

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Until now cooperation experiments in primates have paid little attention to how cooperation can emerge and what effects are produced on the structure of a social group in nature. I performed field experiments with three groups of wild vervet monkeys in South Africa. I induced individuals to repeatedly approach and operate food containers. At least two individuals needed to operate the containers in order to get the reward. The recurrent partner associations observed before the experiment only partly predicted the forming of cooperative partnerships during the experiment. While most of the tested subjects cooperated with other partners, they preferred to do so with specific combinations of individuals and they tended not to mix with other group members outside these preferred partnerships. Cooperation therefore caused the relatively homogeneous networks I observed before the experiment to differentiate. Similar to a matching market, the food sharing partners selected each other limiting their choice. Interestingly neither sex nor age classes explained the specific partner matching. Kinship could not explain it either. Rather, higher ranking individuals cooperated with other higher ranking individuals, and lower ranking also matched among the same rank. This study reveals the key role dominance rank plays when food resources are patchy and can only be accessed through sharing with other individuals.
机译:迄今为止,灵长类动物的合作实验很少关注合作如何产生以及对自然界中的社会群体的结构产生什么影响。我对南非的三组野生黑长尾猴进行了现场实验。我促使人们反复接近和操作食品容器。为了获得奖励,至少需要两个人来操作这些容器。在实验之前观察到的经常性伙伴协会仅部分预测了实验期间合作伙伴关系的形成。尽管大多数测试对象都与其他合作伙伴合作,但他们更喜欢通过特定的个人组合进行合作,并且他们倾向于不与这些首选合作伙伴以外的其他小组成员进行合作。因此,合作使我在实验前观察到的相对均质的网络得以区分。类似于匹配市场,食品共享伙伴彼此选择,限制了他们的选择。有趣的是,性别和年龄段都无法解释特定伴侣的匹配情况。亲属关系也无法解释。相反,较高级别的个人与其他较高级别的个人合作,较低级别的个人也与之匹配。这项研究揭示了当粮食资源稀缺且只能通过与其他人共享才能获得支配地位时的关键作用。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 PLoS Clinical Trials
  • 作者

    Riccardo Pansini;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 2011(6),7
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 e21993
  • 总页数 9
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号