首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Ecosystem Carbon Stock Influenced by Plantation Practice: Implications for Planting Forests as a Measure of Climate Change Mitigation
【2h】

Ecosystem Carbon Stock Influenced by Plantation Practice: Implications for Planting Forests as a Measure of Climate Change Mitigation

机译:人工林影响的生态系统碳储量:植树造林对缓解气候变化的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Uncertainties remain in the potential of forest plantations to sequestrate carbon (C). We synthesized 86 experimental studies with paired-site design, using a meta-analysis approach, to quantify the differences in ecosystem C pools between plantations and their corresponding adjacent primary and secondary forests (natural forests). Totaled ecosystem C stock in plant and soil pools was 284 Mg C ha−1 in natural forests and decreased by 28% in plantations. In comparison with natural forests, plantations decreased aboveground net primary production, litterfall, and rate of soil respiration by 11, 34, and 32%, respectively. Fine root biomass, soil C concentration, and soil microbial C concentration decreased respectively by 66, 32, and 29% in plantations relative to natural forests. Soil available N, P and K concentrations were lower by 22, 20 and 26%, respectively, in plantations than in natural forests. The general pattern of decreased ecosystem C pools did not change between two different groups in relation to various factors: stand age (<25 years vs. ≥25 years), stand types (broadleaved vs. coniferous and deciduous vs. evergreen), tree species origin (native vs. exotic) of plantations, land-use history (afforestation vs. reforestation) and site preparation for plantations (unburnt vs. burnt), and study regions (tropic vs. temperate). The pattern also held true across geographic regions. Our findings argued against the replacement of natural forests by the plantations as a measure of climate change mitigation.
机译:人工林固存碳的潜力仍然不确定。我们使用荟萃分析方法对86项具有成对站点设计的实验研究进行了综合,以量化人工林及其相应的相邻主要和次要森林(天然林)之间生态系统碳库的差异。在天然林中,植物和土壤池中的生态系统碳库总量为284 Mg C ha -1 ,而人工林下降了28%。与天然林相比,人工林地上净初级生产力,凋落物减少和土壤呼吸速率分别减少了11%,34%和32%。与天然林相比,人工林细根生物量,土壤碳浓度和土壤微生物碳浓度分别降低了66%,32%和29%。人工林的土壤有效氮,磷和钾含量分别比天然林低22%,20%和26%。生态系统碳库减少的总体模式在两个不同的组之间并没有因各种因素而变化:林分年龄(<25岁对≥25岁),林分类型(阔叶林,针叶林和落叶林与常绿树),树木种类人工林的起源(本地与异国),土地使用历史(造林与再造林)和人工林的场地准备(未烧成烧),以及研究区域(热带到温带)。该模式在各个地理区域都适用。我们的发现反对用人工林代替天然林来缓解气候变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号