首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Clinical Trials >Protein Networks Reveal Detection Bias and Species Consistency When Analysed by Information-Theoretic Methods
【2h】

Protein Networks Reveal Detection Bias and Species Consistency When Analysed by Information-Theoretic Methods

机译:信息理论方法分析蛋白质网络揭示检测偏差和物种一致性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We apply our recently developed information-theoretic measures for the characterisation and comparison of protein–protein interaction networks. These measures are used to quantify topological network features via macroscopic statistical properties. Network differences are assessed based on these macroscopic properties as opposed to microscopic overlap, homology information or motif occurrences. We present the results of a large–scale analysis of protein–protein interaction networks. Precise null models are used in our analyses, allowing for reliable interpretation of the results. By quantifying the methodological biases of the experimental data, we can define an information threshold above which networks may be deemed to comprise consistent macroscopic topological properties, despite their small microscopic overlaps. Based on this rationale, data from yeast–two–hybrid methods are sufficiently consistent to allow for intra–species comparisons (between different experiments) and inter–species comparisons, while data from affinity–purification mass–spectrometry methods show large differences even within intra–species comparisons.
机译:我们将我们最近开发的信息理论方法应用于蛋白质和蛋白质相互作用网络的表征和比较。这些措施用于通过宏观统计属性量化拓扑网络特征。网络差异是根据这些宏观特性而不是微观重叠,同源性信息或基序出现来评估的。我们介绍了蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用网络的大规模分析结果。在我们的分析中使用了精确的空模型,从而可以可靠地解释结果。通过量化实验数据的方法学偏差,我们可以定义一个信息阈值,在该阈值之上,尽管网络之间存在微小的重叠,但它们仍被视为包含一致的宏观拓扑属性。基于此原理,酵母双杂交方法的数据足够一致,可以进行种内比较(在不同实验之间)和种间比较,而亲和纯化质谱法的数据显示出很大的差异,即使在内部–种类比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号