首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oxford Open >The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons
【2h】

The Traditional or Reverse Algorithm for Diagnosis of Syphilis: Pros and Cons

机译:诊断梅毒的传统或逆向算法:利弊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question “What diagnostic considerations should be taken into account when screening for syphilis using the traditional or reverse algorithm?” Improved laboratory diagnosis of syphilis is an important element of the effort to reduce syphilis rates. Screening for syphilis is performed using either a nontreponemal or treponemal test (part of the traditional or reverse algorithm, respectively). Both syphilis algorithms are used by laboratories. However, there are limited data on the performance and cost-effectiveness of the algorithms. An expert panel generated “key questions” in the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. This paper pertains to the key factors that should be considered when deciding whether to screen for syphilis using either the traditional or the reverse algorithm. A systematic literature review was performed, and tables of evidence were created to address this question.
机译:我们审查了有关梅毒的诊断文献,以解决“使用传统或逆向算法筛查梅毒时应考虑哪些诊断考虑因素”的问题。改善梅毒的实验室诊断是降低梅毒发生率的一项重要工作。梅毒的筛查是使用非四方或四方测试(分别是传统或逆向算法的一部分)进行的。实验室都使用两种梅毒算法。但是,关于算法的性能和成本效益的数据有限。一个专家小组提出了梅毒实验室诊断中的“关键问题”。本文涉及在决定使用传统算法还是反向算法筛查梅毒时应考虑的关键因素。进行了系统的文献综述,并创建了证据表来解决这个问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号