首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nicotine Tobacco Research >The 2016 Ferno Award Address: Three Things
【2h】

The 2016 Ferno Award Address: Three Things

机译:2016年费尔诺奖致辞:三件事

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Researchers may optimize smoking treatment by addressing three research topics that have been relatively neglected. First, researchers have neglected to intensively explore how counseling contents affect smoking cessation success. Worldwide, millions of smokers are exposed to different smoking cessation contents and messages, yet existing research evidence does not permit strong inference about the value of particular counseling contents or strategies. Research in this area could enhance smoking outcomes and yield new insights into smoking motivation. Second, researchers have focused great attention on inducing smokers to make quit attempts when they contact healthcare systems; the success of such efforts may have plateaued. Also, the vast majority of quit attempts are self-quit attempts, largely unsuccessful, that occur outside such contacts. Researchers should explore strategies for using healthcare systems as conduits for digital- and other population-based interventions independent of healthcare visits. Such resources should be used to graft timely access to evidence-based intervention onto self-quitting, yielding evidence-based, patient-managed quit attempts. Third, most smoking treatments are assembled via selection of components based on informal synthesis of empirical and impressionistic evidence and are evaluated as a package. However, recent factorial experiments show that components ofsmoking treatments often interact meaningfully; for example, some components may interferewith the effectiveness of other components. Many extant treatments likely comprisesuboptimal sets of components; future treatment development should routinely use factorialexperiments to permit the assembly of components that yield additive or synergisticeffects.Research in the above three areas should significantly advance our understanding oftobacco use and its treatment.Implications: A lack of relevant research, and the likely prospect of significantclinical and public health benefit, underscore the importance of performing research onthree topics related to smoking intervention: (1) researchers need to identify whichcontents of smoking counseling are effective; (2) researchers need to devise innovativestrategies that use healthcare systems as conduits of smoking treatment delivery outsideof clinical contacts; and (3) researchers need to use factorial designs to guide theirdevelopment of smoking treatments. Research on these topics should yield complementaryevidence that guides the development of more effective smoking treatments.
机译:研究人员可以通过解决三个相对被忽视的研究主题来优化吸烟治疗。首先,研究人员忽略了深入探讨咨询内容如何影响戒烟成功的方法。在全球范围内,数以百万计的吸烟者接触到不同的戒烟内容和信息,但是现有的研究证据不能强有力地推断出特定咨询内容或策略的价值。在这一领域的研究可以提高吸烟效果,并对吸烟动机产生新的见解。其次,研究人员非常关注诱导吸烟者在接触保健系统时要戒烟。这种努力的成功可能已经停滞不前。同样,绝大多数的退出尝试都是在这种接触之外发生的自我退出尝试,在很大程度上是不成功的。研究人员应探索将医疗保健系统用作独立于医疗保健就诊的数字和其他基于人群的干预措施的渠道的策略。这些资源应用于将及时获得基于证据的干预措施移植到自我戒烟,产生基于证据,患者管理的戒烟尝试上。第三,大多数吸烟治疗是通过根据经验和印象主义证据的非正式综合选择成分而组装而成的,并作为一揽子评估方案进行评估。但是,最近的阶乘实验表明,吸烟治疗通常会有意义地相互作用;例如,某些组件可能会干扰与其他组件的有效性。许多现存的治疗可能包括次优组件集;未来的治疗方法应常规使用阶乘允许组装产生加性或协同作用的组件的实验在以上三个方面的研究应大大提高我们对烟草使用及其治疗。启示:缺乏相关研究,潜在的重大前景临床和公共卫生利益,强调了对以下方面进行研究的重要性与吸烟干预有关的三个主题:(1)研究人员需要确定吸烟咨询的内容是有效的; (2)研究人员需要设计创新使用医疗系统作为外部吸烟治疗渠道的策略临床接触; (3)研究人员需要使用阶乘设计来指导他们吸烟治疗的发展。对这些主题的研究应产生互补指导开发更有效的吸烟治疗的证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号